AGENDA Rogers City Council May 12, 2026 - 7:00 PM 1. CALL TO ORDER AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 2. OPEN FORUM Individuals may address the Council about any item not contained on the regular agenda. A maximum of 10 minutes is allocated for the Forum. If the full 10 minutes are not needed for the Forum, the Mayor will continue with the agenda. If additional time is needed for the Forum, the Council will continue the Forum following Other Business on the agenda. The Council will take no official action on items discussed at the Forum, with the exception of referral to staff or Commission for future report. 3. PRESENTATIONS 4. APPROVE AGENDA Council members may add items to the agenda for discussion purposes or staff direction only. The Council will not normally take official action on items added to the agenda. 5. CONSENT AGENDA These items are considered to be routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Councilmember so requests, in which event the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and placed elsewhere on the agenda. 5.1 Approval of Minutes 5.2 Approval of Bills and Claims 5.3 Approval of Special Event Permit Application for Hisco, Inc. for September 17, 2026 5.4 Approval of Ice Resurfacer Purchase for Rink 2 5.5 Approve Second Amendment to May 26, 2020 Trailway Cooperative Agreement with Three Rivers Park District for the grade-separated crossing of CR 144/141st Avenue, City Project No. 2107 5.6 Approve Fleet and Equipment Proposed Changes Page 1 of 131 5.7 Approve Payment to Xcel Energy to Relocate Overhead Power for City Hall and Police Department Civic Campus, City Project No. 2202 5.8 Call a Public hearing for Tuesday, May 26, 2026 at 7:00 p.m. to Consider the Adoption of Franchise Fee Ordinances for the Public and Cooperative Utilities Serving the City 5.9 Approval of the First Amendment to the Purchase Agreement with Cloutier Properties for the Sale of City-Owned Property Setting a Closing Date 5.10 Approval of the Fifth Amendment to the Purchase Agreement with Jacob Ventures, LLC Granting Additional Time to Close 5.11 Authorize Execution of Early Grading Agreement for Northview Preserve 2nd Addition. 5.12 Authorize Execution of Early Grading Agreement for Cowley Lake Preserve 2nd Addition Area 6. PUBLIC HEARINGS 6.1 Public Hearing to identify Qualified 501(c)(3) Users of the Rogers Activity Center in the City of Rogers 7. GENERAL BUSINESS 7.1 Approval of Resolution 2026-49 Approving a Site Plan and Variance Request for a Retail Center at 21355 136th Ave (Lot Adjacent to Maynards) by Cloutier Properties 8. OTHER BUSINESS 9. CORRESPONDENCE AND REPORTS 10. ADJOURN Page 2 of 131 STAFF REPORT Meeting Date: May 12, 2026 ROGERS CITY COUNCIL Agenda Item: 5.1 Subject: Approval of Minutes Prepared By: Stacie Brown, City Clerk Recommended Council Action Motion to approve the April 28, 2026 Council Work Session minutes and the April 28, 2026 City Council meeting minutes. Overview / Background / Analysis Staff Recommendation Motion to approve the April 28, 2026 Council Work Session minutes and the April 28, 2026 City Council meeting minutes. Financial Impact: Source Fund: Budgeted? Supporting Documentation A. 04282026min - work session B. 04282026min Page 3 of 131 City of Rogers City Council Work Session Meeting Minutes April 28, 2026 1. CALL TO ORDER The Work Session of the City Council of the City of Rogers was called to order by Mayor Klick on Tuesday, April 28, 2026, at 5:30 PM at Rogers Community Room, 21201 Memorial Drive, Rogers, MN, 55374 and online in the Teams application. Council present: Shannon Klick, Kevin Jullie, Amy Enga, Joel Brockman Council excused: Mark Eiden Staff present: Steve Stahmer, Administrator; Stacy Scharber, Assistant City Administrator/HR Director; Bridget Bruska, Finance Director; Jason Foster, Deputy Chief of Police; Doran Cote, Public Works Director/City Engineer; Mike Bauer, Parks and Recreation Director; Brett Angell, Community Development Director; Jason Greninger, IS Director; and Stacie Brown, City Clerk. 2. GENERAL BUSINESS 2.1 Discussion on Utility Fees Finance Director Bruska introduced Jon Eaton of AE2S, who shared an overview of the Utility Rate Study recently completed by their firm for the City of Rogers. He noted that the City's current fees are in line with comparable cities, however, would be considered low. This means there is room for an increase. Mr. Eaton provided information about Impact Fees: • New or expanded customers offset costs that existing users paid for service, supply, capacity expansions, etc. Impact fees cover the development and building phases • Considerations/Limitations: Fee cannot exceed cost, proportional to demand from development, equal level of service, avoid double charging • Typically used for growth-related capital, however, it can generally be used for all capital projects (cannot be used for operations) Mr. Eaton reviewed the City's current Impact Fees for water, sanitary sewer, and stormwater. Compared to similar cities, fees in Rogers are on the lower end. He shared the process of determining a maximum justifiable Impact Fee, and a simplified proposed structure and distribution, with 40% in the development phase, and 60% in the building phase. Mr. Eaton shared an Impact Fee comparison for surrounding cities. Councilor Brockman asked how much the proposed increase could impact the ability to market property in the city. Angell stated that there has been substantial discussion, and he has concerns about any fee increases. However, he will work with the changes. Bruska noted that any developments who have submitted applications prior to adoption of the Ordinance being considered tonight will have the fees charged which were in effect at the time Page 4 of 131of the application. The amended fee schedule would only be for new commercial/industrial development applications coming in after May 1st. She added this would be a four-year transition, and the fees would be increased gradually instead of one large jump. 2.2 Discussion on Civic Campus Bid Packages #1 and #2, City Project No. 2202 Public Works Director shared the background of the Civic Campus project, including the recent approval of the Preliminary and Final Plats. He explained there is a nearly year-long lead time on precast concrete panels, and Terra Construction is proposing an early bid package to prevent any delays. Cote presented the bidding schedule, with Council approval of the final Guaranteed Maximum Price anticipated on 7/28/26. He reviewed the bidder selection process, with all details included in tonight's regular meeting packet. He shared a proposed fee reconciliation from Leo A. Daly, building plans, and tonight's recommended Council action. Council discussed the fee reconciliation, noting the uncertainty of costs with current economic conditions. Councilor Brockman asked if the overground utilities would be buried. Cote explained that Xcel Energy is proposing to relocate the overhead power to the South side of the street, so there won't be a visual impact. Councilor Enga asked why they wouldn't bury them, and Cote stated it was due to cost and lack of space, with many other utilities buried on the boulevard. Enga inquired about communication with the public. City Administrator Stahmer shared that there have been extensive discussions on the subject relative to the Main Street Master Plan, and Cote is also working with Terra Construction to develop signage on the site. Communications Manager Williams is also developing a plan for the project. Angell added that meetings have been held with multiple stakeholders and businesses, and information has been provided via the Main Street open house, and a public survey. Brockman asked about signage on the campus. Todd LaVold of Leo A. Daly explained that as of right now, the side facing Main Street will have a City of Rogers sign, including an electronic message board. Councilor Jullie asked about the bonding process. Bruska explained that a bonding CIP needs to be done, and this speaks to what projects are planned for issuing bonds. That part has been done, with a Public Hearing and petition having been completed. At this point, we would be able to move forward with bonding. 3. ADJOURN Mayor Klick adjourned the meeting at 6:33 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Stacie Brown City Clerk Page 5 of 131 City of Rogers City Council Meeting Minutes April 28, 2026 1. CALL TO ORDER AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rogers was called to order by Mayor Klick on Tuesday, April 28, 2026, at 7:00 PM at Rogers Community Room, 21201 Memorial Drive, Rogers, MN, 55374 and online in the Teams application. Council present: Shannon Klick, Kevin Jullie, Amy Enga, Joel Brockman Council excused: Mark Eiden Staff present: Steve Stahmer, Administrator; Stacy Scharber, Assistant City Administrator/HR Director; Bridget Bruska, Finance Director; Jason Foster, Deputy Chief of Police; Patrick Farrens, Fire Chief; Doran Cote, Public Works Director/City Engineer; Mike Bauer, Parks and Recreation Director; Brett Angell, Community Development Director; Jason Greninger, IS Director; Bob Vose, City Attorney; and Stacie Brown, City Clerk. 2. OPEN FORUM Ruth Bagniewski, 13048 Brookside Lane North, came forward to express concerns related to Main Street Crosswalks and Clean Up Day. She pointed out that there is a crosswalk sign but no painting on the ground on the crosswalk by the Event Center. Regarding Clean-Up day, she had only seen information about Clean-Up Day in the Spring Newsletter. Public Works Director/City Engineer Cote noted that it was also posted on the main page of the City website. Mayor Klick asked where Ms. Bagniewski would like to see Clean-Up Day advertised, and she replied that it could be posted on signs similar to hydrant flushing notifications. She would also like to see more security at public meetings, and more availability of bike racks. Mayor Klick thanked her for sharing her concerns. 3. PRESENTATIONS None. 4. APPROVE AGENDA Councilor Brockman moved, Councilor Enga seconded a motion to approve agenda as submitted. Motion carried 4-0. 5. CONSENT AGENDA 5.1 Approval of April 14, 2026 City Council Meeting Minutes 5.2 Approval of Bills and Claims 5.3 Approve Professional Services Agreement with GTEL Advisors for Police Department Records Management System Consulting Page 6 of 131 5.4 Approval of Resolution No. 2026-44, A Resolution Rescinding Assessment Incorrectly Levied Against 21309 Poate Court (PID 26-120-23-13-0070) in 2025 for Delinquent Utilities 5.5 Approval of Resolution 2026-29 Approving a Lot Split for 20061 Vevea Rd (PID 24- 120-23-34-0012) Related to the Oppidan Light Industrial Development 5.6 Approval of Resolution 2026-42 Approving the Rogers Athletic Complex Final Plat (TruStone Center) 5.7 Approval of Resolution 2026-43 Supporting a Job Creation Fund Application in Connection with Twin City Hose 5.8 Approval of Contract Extension for Front Burner Sports and Entertainment Naming Rights Agreement 5.9 Cooperative Agreements between the Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission (ECWMC) and the City of Rogers • Approve and Authorize Execution of Cooperative Agreement between the Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission (ECWMC) and the City of Rogers for Fox Creek Streambank Restoration Phase 2 (Creekview) • Approve and Authorize Execution of Cooperative Agreement between the Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission (ECWMC) and the City of Rogers for Fox Creek Streambank Restoration Phase 3 (Hyacinth) • Approve and Authorize Execution of Cooperative Agreement between the Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission (ECWMC) and the City of Rogers for Rogers Downtown Pond Expansion and Reuse 5.10 Approve Professional Services Agreement for Material Testing with American Engineering and Testing (AET) for South Diamond Lake Road and Hassan Parkway Mill and Overlay & 2026 Pavement Management Project, City Project Nos. 2401, 2402 & 2501 5.11 Approval to Use Park Dedication Funds for Improvements to Rogers High School Baseball Facilities 5.12 Approval of Resolution No. 2026-46, A Resolution Calling for a Public Hearing to Identify Qualified 501(c)(3) Users of the Rogers Activity Center in the City of Rogers 5.13 Approve Changes to FirstDue Contract Councilor Jullie requested to pull items 5.9 and 5.11 for separate discussion. Councilor Jullie moved, Councilor Brockman seconded a motion to approve the Consent Agenda as amended. Motion carried 4-0. Item 5.9: Cooperative Agreements Between the Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission (ECWMC) and the City of Rogers Councilor Jullie inquired about the City's involvement in the project, and if it is led by the ECWMC. Public Works Director/City Engineer Cote explained that the Fox Creek Stream Bank Restorations (Phases 2 and 3) are future projects which are programmed in the Elm Creek Watershed CIP. The City of Rogers will be the lead on the project, and the ECWMC will be funding it. In seeking reimbursement for the projects, it was recently discovered that the Page 7 of 131three agreements still needed to be brought before the City Council for approval. Councilor Jullie moved, Mayor Klick seconded a motion to approve Cooperative Agreements between the Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission and the City of Rogers. Motion carried 4-0. Item 5.11: Approval to Use Park Dedication Funds for Improvements to Rogers High School Baseball Facilities Councilor Jullie inquired about Park Dedication funds being utilized for improvements on School District property. Parks and Recreation Director Bauer explained that the subject area is covered by the City's Joint Powers Agreement with Independent School District 728, with some sections on City property, and others on School District property. The Park Commission stipulated that the facilities must remain open for use by the community, not just the High School. Councilor Jullie moved, Councilor Enga seconded a motion to approve the use of Park Dedication funds for improvements to Rogers High School Baseball Facilities. Motion carried 4-0. 6. PUBLIC HEARINGS 6.1 Public Hearing to Consider Adopting the Following Ordinance and Resolution: • Ordinance No. 2026-08, An Ordinance Amending the 2026 Master Fee Schedule for the City of Rogers • Resolution No. 2026-30, A Resolution Authorizing Summary Publication of Ordinance No. 2026-08 Finance Director Bruska shared the background of a Utility Rate Study which was recently completed for the City by AE2S, LLC. She introduced Jon Eaton from AE2S to present the findings and recommendations. Mr. Eaton reviewed the objectives of the Utility Rate Study, including development of a rate plan to meet revenue requirements for each utility. He explained the rate study approach and methodology, and reviewed the rate structures for Sewer, Water and Storm. He presented recommended structure changes and bill impacts for various usage categories. He further explained changes in the tiered billing to lower the rate and keep fees as equitable as possible for the low-end user. Mr. Eaton provided an overview of Impact Fees, which occur at a time of development, and are designed so that "growth pays for growth." He shared a map of the future growth areas supporting Impact Fees, as well as current and proposed fees. Bruska thanked Mr. Eaton and AE2S for their work on this study. She recapped changes to the fee schedule, to become effective on the usage date of May 1, 2026 for utility billing. For Page 8 of 131Impact Fees, developments which are in the pipeline as of now would be calculated based on the time when they submitted their application. Mayor Klick moved, Councilor Enga seconded a motion to open the Public Hearing at 7:37 p.m. Motion carried 4-0. Mark Johnson, 25300 Tucker Road, stated he has a property in the Agricultural Preserve Program. He is concerned about the Stormwater fee and wants to know if his property will remain exempt. He has challenged this charge previously and got the City to agree not to charge. Bruska explained that previously, the charges were based on land use, and there was a slight loophole which put agricultural properties in a gray area. To clarify, the money was refunded to Mr. Johnson and a small group of other agricultural property owners with the caveat that the City would be reevaluating this in the future. Bruska noted that agricultural properties are one of the main contributors to stormwater runoff and chemicals in the system. With this in mind, they would be subject to the $6.00 monthly fee. Mr. Johnson challenged the findings that agricultural properties are significant contributors, stating that stormwater on his property stays on his property. He stated that he sees no benefit to his property with the stormwater system, and development comes closer, he is seeing more water coming onto his property. Mayor Klick inquired on the process for a dispute of this type, noting there had been a work- around for a long time. Public Works Director/City Engineer Cote stated he would be able to meet with Mr. Johnson to review his concerns, and if there is a different outcome, it would be brought back to the City Council. Jim Kelley, 12165 Kelley Lane, stated he owns 28 acres which is not agricultural, but there is a large swamp that collects extra water. He asked if he is charged for having that large reservoir. Cote replied that the residential charge would apply, as not all water actually stays on Mr. Kelley's property; Stormwater pays for the entire city and all water flowing to the river. City Administrator Stahmer added that there were significant engineering stormwater challenges in that vicinity during the reconstruction of Kelley Lane. Jim Kemmetmueller, 25105 Territorial and 25465 Territorial Rd, stated his properties are in the Agricultural Preserve Program. He maintains the ditch, and the developments are putting more water and pressure on their land. He thinks there are more problems with development, and he doesn't want to see a charge. He stated this would take the enjoyment out of his livelihood. Mayor Klick moved, Councilor Enga seconded a motion to close the Public Hearing at 7:45 p.m. Motion carried 4-0. Councilor Enga asked if additional discussion is needed about the properties in the Agricultural Preserve Program. Councilor Brockman asked if this is more affected by developments alongside it, or the practice of the land itself. Cote stated that a simple Google search shows agricultural land is shown to be the largest polluter of water resources. All Page 9 of 131properties drain into the stormwater system, and everyone contributes to it, not just development, mining, etc. That is why staff propose that the fee be paid by all, and the funds are used for repairs and maintenance of that system. Enga asked if there is a process for inquiring about changes in stormwater flow due to development. Cote explained that every development is reviewed by the Elm Creek Watershed and must conform to their rules. The development cannot generate more water than before it was constructed, and all developers have to demonstrate compliance through a stormwater study. Enga asked how a property owner who disagrees can discuss this. Cote stated they could contact Public Works for review and determination. Mayor Klick moved, Councilor Jullie seconded a motion to approve Ordinance 2026-08; An Ordinance Amending the 2026 Master Fee Schedule. Motion carried 4-0. Mayor Klick moved, Councilor Jullie seconded a motion to approve Resolution 2026-30, A Resolution Authorizing Summary Publication of Ordinance 2026-08. Motion carried 4-0. Mayor Klick moved, Councilor Enga seconded a motion to adopt the 2026 Utility Rate Study. Motion carried 4-0. 6.2 Items Related to the Issuance of 2024B General Obligation Abatement Bonds • Public Hearing on Proposed Property Tax Abatements for the Purpose of Issuing Tax Abatement Bonds to Finance the Expansion of the Rogers Activity Center • Resolution No. 2026-47, A Resolution Approving Tax Abatements • Resolution No. 2026-45, A Resolution Providing for the Competitive Negotiated Sale of $9,985,000 General Obligation Tax Abatement Bonds, Series 2026A Jason Aarsvold of Ehlers shared a presentation covering the General Financing Plan for the Rogers Activity Center, as well as Tax Abatement requirements. This process requires a Public Hearing to be held and passage of a Resolution. He reviewed the Tax Abatement Bond details, including revenue details for naming rights, operating income, Rogers Youth Hockey Association and Booster Club contributions. Councilor Jullie moved, Councilor Brockman seconded a motion to open the Public Hearing at 8:02 p.m. Motion carried 4-0. No one came forward. Councilor Jullie moved, Councilor Brockman seconded a motion to close the Public Hearing at 8:03 p.m. Motion carried 4-0. Councilor Jullie moved, Councilor Enga seconded a motion to approve Resolution 2026-47, A Resolution Approving Tax Abatements. Motion carried 4-0. Councilor Enga moved, Councilor Brockman seconded a motion to approve Resolution 2026- Page 10 of 13145. A Resolution Providing for Competitive Negotiated Sale of $9,985.000 General Obligation Tax Abatement Bonds, Series 2026A. Motion carried 4-0. 7. GENERAL BUSINESS 7.1 Approve Items Related to Park Maintenance • Recognize Park Maintenance Supervisor Scott Weltzin • Approve Promotion of Tim Daluge to Park Maintenance Supervisor • Approve Promotion of Zach Moen to Park Maintenance Crew Leader • Authorize the Backfill of Park Maintenance Medium Equipment Operator (MEO) • Approve Reorganization to Create Facilities Supervisor Position • Approve Facilities Maintenance Supervisor Position Description • Approve Promotion of Jason Doboszenski to Facilities Supervisor Cote recognized Park Maintenance Supervisor Scott Weltzin for his service with the City of Rogers, noting that for over 20 years, he has played a key role in overseeing park operations. His notable accomplishments include oversight of park maintenance and capital improvement projects, leadership and mentorship of staff, collaboration with community groups and stakeholders, development of the park and trail system (including two regional parks), and a full-size indoor turf facility. Council expressed gratitude for Mr. Weltzin's service and wished him well in retirement. He thanked Council for their support in building the Parks department to the level it is today. Cote reviewed the following proposed staffing changes with Mr. Weltzin's retirement: • Promotion of Tim Daluge to Park Maintenance Supervisor • Promotion of Zach Moen to Park Maintenance Crew Leader • Authorize the backfill of Park Maintenance Medium Equipment Operator (MEO) • Approve reorganization to create Facilities Supervisor Position • Approve Facilities Maintenance Supervisor position description • Approve Promotion of Jason Doboszenski to Facilities Supervisor Mayor Klick moved, Councilor Enga seconded a motion to approve the following items: • Recognize Park Maintenance Supervisor Scott Weltzin • Approve Promotion of Tim Daluge to Park Maintenance Supervisor • Approve Promotion of Zach Moen to Park Maintenance Crew Leader • Authorize the Backfill of Park Maintenance Medium Equipment Operator (MEO) • Approve Reorganization to Create Facilities Supervisor Position • Approve Facilities Maintenance Supervisor Position Description • Approve Promotion of Jason Doboszenski to Facilities Supervisor Motion carried 4-0. Page 11 of 131 7.2 Items Related to City Hall and Police Department Civic Campus, City Project No. 2202 • Approve Bid Package #1 and Bidder Qualification Selection Criteria and Authorize Solicitation of Bids • Approve Contract Modification Number 01 with Leo A Daly Public Works Director/City Engineer Cote presented the background of City Project No. 2202; the proposed City Hall and Police Department campus. He shared that in the planning process, the City's Construction Manager at Risk (Terra Construction) advised staff and the City's architectural consultant about extended lead times with orders for precast concrete. To address this issue, Terra Construction has proposed an early bid package to include demolition, precast panels, earthwork and underground utilities (Bid Package No. 1). Bid Package No. 2 would cover the remainder of the project. Cote shared details of the proposed bidding schedule, and bidder qualification and selection criteria. He presented a proposed fee reconciliation for the City's architectural Firm, Leo A. Daly, with a total increase in fees of $335,304.90. He shared schematics of the facility, noting only minor changes to the floor plan. Todd LaVold of Leo A. Daly was present at the meeting and expressed enthusiasm for the project. Councilor Jullie moved, Councilor Brockman seconded a motion to approve Bid Package No. 1 and Bidder Qualification Selection Criteria and authorize solicitation of bids. Motion carried 4-0. Councilor Jullie moved, Councilor Enga seconded a motion to approve Contract Modification Number 01 with Leo A. Daly. Motion carried 4-0. 7.3 Approve Professional Services Agreement (PSA) with SRF Consulting Group for Main Street (CSAH 150) and Territorial Road (CSAH 159) Roundabout Design, City Project No. 1811 Public Works Director/City Engineer Cote recalled that in May 2025, staff applied for a $500,000 Hennepin County grant to construct a roundabout at the intersection of Main Street and Territorial Road. The application was successful, and the City was awarded the full $500,000. Cote shared that a Request for Proposals (RFP) was subsequently issued for qualified engineering and planning firms to provide professional engineering services for the design of the roundabout. The RFP was issued to three firms; SRF Consulting, Kimley-Horn and Associates, and Bolton and Menk. The proposals were ranked with input from a Hennepin County representative, and the consensus was that SRF delivered the most comprehensive proposal. Councilor Brockman asked if the turnback of Main Street to the City needs to happen before the roundabout construction can start. Cote stated that it's possible either way. Councilor Brockman moved, Councilor Enga seconded a motion to approve a Professional Page 12 of 131Services Agreement with SRF Consulting Group for Main Street and Territorial Road roundabout design. Motion carried 4-0. 7.4 Approval of 2025 Year-End Closing Activity Finance Director Bruska shared details of the year-end activity in accordance with accounting standards. The auditors will present the actual final results of the audit at the first Council meeting in June. Bruska explained that the year-end General Fund balance is looking to increase by approximately $600,000, which can be attributed to several factors including a strong interest rate environment with positive market value adjustments. Investments must be recorded at fair market value, as required by accounting standards. Bruska noted that in 2025, building permits and development exceeded expectations, and Police State Aid revenues exceeded the budgeted historical estimates. Additionally, there were salary and benefits savings as two budgeted Fire Department positions were filled later in the year. Bruska reviewed the fund balance policy, recommended transfers and budget adjustments. At this time, she is requesting approval for a year-end transfer and budget adjustments for two items approved in 2025. These transfers will not impact the levy. Councilor Enga moved, Mayor Klick seconded a motion to authorize the 2025 transfers and budget carriers as identified in the memo as of 12/31/2025. Motion carried 4-0. 8. OTHER BUSINESS None. 9. CORRESPONDENCE AND REPORTS 9.1 Report of City Administrator Annual Review 10. ADJOURN Mayor Klick adjourned the meeting at 8:30 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Stacie Brown City Clerk Page 13 of 131 STAFF REPORT Meeting Date: May 12, 2026 ROGERS CITY COUNCIL Agenda Item: 5.2 Subject: Approval of Bills and Claims Prepared By: Bridget Bruska, Finance Director Recommended Council Action Motion to approve bills and claims as presented. Overview / Background / Analysis According to the City's purchasing policy, all purchases made by City staff must be reviewed and approved by the City Council during each Council meeting via the consent agenda. Attached is a summary of payments issued by the City since the cutoff date of the previous Council meeting. Detailed supporting documentation is provided to Council as nonpublic background material to reduce fraud risk and is available for public inspection upon request, as permitted by law. Staff Recommendation Motion to approve bills and claims as presented. Financial Impact: N/A Source Fund: N/A Budgeted? N/A Supporting Documentation A. AP Cover Sheet B. 05-01-2026 Checks #97497-97548 & ACH Payments $491,277.48 C. March Purchsing Cards Page 14 of 131CITY OF ROGERS 05.12.2026 CITY COUNCIL MEETING OPERATING ACCOUNTS - ADDITIONAL CLAIMS PAID/TO BE PAID City Payroll Checks, Taxes & Misc Fees Paid 4/30/2026ADP Child Support/Garnishment 279.77 4/30/2026ADP Direct Deposits 335,870.03 4/30/2026 ADP Payroll Taxes 127,858.86 4/24/2026Associated Bank FSA/DCAP 290.00 5/5/2026Associated Bank FSA/DCAP 50.00 4/27/2026Group Health EAP Charges 200.20 5/4/2026ICMA Deferred Compensation 3,125.00 4/30/2026Associated Bank Health Plan Fund 7,147.94 5/4/2026Associated Bank Health Plan Fund 3,400.00 5/4/2026PERA 84,139.13 5/4/2026 State of MN HCSP 4,597.41 5/4/2026State of MN - Deferred Comp 14,310.00 4/22/2026The Hartford - April 2,429.66 Payroll & Misc Fee Expenditures 583,698.00 City Checks & ACH Paid 5/1/2026City Checks & ACH Paid (97497-97548) 491,277.48 City Check & ACH Expenditures 491,277.48 City Misc ACH/Wires Paid 5/4/2026 Credit Card Fees City 9,508.19 5/4/2026 Civic Pay Fees Utility Billing 5,243.93 3/18/2026US Bank Credit Cards - March 35,441.44 5/4/2026Finnly Sports Payments Credit Card Fees RAC 2,909.81 5/5/2026 Payment Services Network Processing Fees 335.35 City ACH/Wire Expenditures 53,438.72 City Total To Be Approved 1,128,414.20 Liquor Misc ACH/Wires Paid 5/4/2026Credit Card Processing Fees - RWAS 5,642.17 5/4/2026Credit Card Processing Fees - RWAS 463.06 5/4/2026Credit Card Interchange Fees- RWAS 125.34 5/4/2026Credit Card Adjustment Charges- RWAS 1,250.00 Liquor ACH/Wire Expenditures 7,480.57 Liquor Total to Be Approved 7,480.57 Page 15 of 131 STAFF REPORT Meeting Date: May 12, 2026 ROGERS CITY COUNCIL Agenda Item: 5.3 Subject: Approval of Special Event Permit Application for Hisco, Inc. for September 17, 2026 Prepared By: Stacie Brown, City Clerk Recommended Council Action Motion to approve a Special Event Permit application for Hisco, Inc. on September 17, 2026, conditioned upon department approvals. Overview / Background / Analysis Hisco, Inc. has submitted a Special Event Permit Application with required fees for an Open House event to be held on September 17, 2025 at 13000 Wilfred Lane in Rogers. The application has been routed to the appropriate departments for review, and a permit will not be issued until all departments have granted approval. Staff Recommendation Motion to approve a Special Event Permit application for Hisco, Inc. on September 17, 2026, conditioned upon department approvals. Financial Impact: Source Fund: Budgeted? N/A Supporting Documentation None Page 16 of 131 STAFF REPORT Meeting Date: May 12, 2026 ROGERS CITY COUNCIL Agenda Item: 5.4 Subject: Approval of Ice Resurfacer Purchase for Rink 2 Prepared By: Mike Bauer, Parks & Recreation Director Recommended Council Action Motion to authorize staff to purchase the Zamboni Model 552AC ice resurfacer for Rink 2 using Sourcewell pricing in the amount of $157,431.66, and to approve the required $25,000 deposit at the time of order. Overview / Background / Analysis The City of Rogers is preparing for the opening of Rink 2, anticipated in Fall 2027. To maintain the construction timeline and ensure the facility is operational as planned, staff must proceed with ordering the ice resurfacer, given the manufacturer's approximately 400-day lead time (Zamboni Company USA, Inc.). Staff has reviewed the proposal for the Zamboni Model 552AC equipped with a traditional lead acid battery package, consistent with the City’s current operational preferences. This recommendation follows operational challenges with the City’s previous lithium-ion battery system, which was replaced earlier this year. Zamboni has honored Sourcewell cooperative purchasing pricing equivalent to the City's last unit purchase, providing cost stability for this acquisition. The Zamboni 552AC includes: • 510 AH lead-acid battery with charger • Aluminum wheels • Guide wheel • Parking brake • Poly side plate • Spare tire and wheel assembly • (2) 77” blades • Wash water system with a poly tank • Board brush • Single-point battery water system • Tire wash system • Stainless steel water distribution pipe • Galvanized conditioner and other standard items Total Cost: $157,431.66 Page 17 of 131Terms: $25,000 deposit at order; balance net 30 days from shipment. The purchase will be funded through the approved capital budget for Rink 2 equipment. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends the City Council authorize staff to order the Zamboni Model 552AC ice resurfacer using Sourcewell pricing in the amount of $157,431.66, to ensure timely delivery for the opening of Rink 2. Financial Impact: $157,431.66 Source Fund: Project Funds Budgeted? Yes Supporting Documentation A. 552AC 03.23.26 Proposal Page 18 of 131 March 23, 2026 Mike Bauer City of Rogers Rogers Activity Center 21080-141st Ave N Rogers MN 55374 PROPOSAL “The principal product you have to sell is the ice itself.” – Frank J. Zamboni Maintaining an ice surface presents a multitude of challenges. Having efficient and reliable resurfacing equipment should not be one of them. Driven by our founder’s commitment to innovation, we put our product to the test in the harsh environment it will call home. Every feature is deliberately designed to make resurfacing easier and to ensure that the end result is an exceptional sheet of ice. Built by hand. One at a time. The result is an ice resurfacing machine legendary for its quality, durability and superior performance. MODEL 552AC: Clean ice. Clean air. Clear choice. Building upon the solid reputation of its predecessor, the Model 552AC features worry-free AC motors and controls, introducing new efficiencies and virtually eliminating associated maintenance. The battery package is easy to access and maintain. Proven and dependable controls built for tough industrial applications. Microprocessor controlled smart chargers deliver long battery life. The Model 552AC provides a low maintenance option for your high maintenance surface. MODEL 552AC LITHIUM-ION (OPTIONAL): Zero battery maintenance and lithium-ion power combine for the ultimate upgrade to the world’s most popular electric ice resurfacer. Lithium-ion batteries charge quickly between resurfacings, eliminating overnight charging. Sealed zero maintenance batteries are truly emission-free. Charging is controlled by battery management system to optimize charging and balancing. Strong conveyor performance at any speed. Our unrivaled down pressure system ensures that all you leave behind is perfect. INNOVATION: Our commitment to constant innovation is an investment in the end product. We apply decades of experience working with facility owners and operators into every decision we make. Automated processes provide a consistent end result and reduce the chance for operator error. Opportunities to retrieve and display data from the machine provide a new tool in rink management. The incremental and continued introduction of new and better technologies to our ice resurfacing machines facilitates savings of time and valuable resources. Page 19 of 131 Zamboni 552AC Proposal QUALITY: Zamboni sets the standard of quality to which the industry is held. The Zamboni Company holds itself to an even higher standard with ongoing assessment and meticulous quality control, resulting in products which consistently produce the finest sheet of ice even after many years of use. Our rugged four-wheel drive chassis is hand-built using strong all-welded steel tubing. Premium materials and components are used throughout. We continually collaborate with our customers to ensure the products that will ultimately end up in their facility exceed the high expectations of quality associated with our brand. VALUE: Zamboni has a well-deserved reputation as the Industry Leader. One which we don’t take for granted. Our products have the lowest cost of operation and maintain the highest residual value. A network of Zamboni Authorized Distributors and our own Customer Service teams provide local service and support for our products. In the world of ice, time is money and unreliable equipment can be a show-stopper. Yet another reason that worldwide, more facility operators choose Zamboni for their ice resurfacing needs. Nothing else is even close. MACHINE SPECIFICATIONS: Machine specifications are also available online. Please copy the web links below into your browser. https://zamboni.com/wp-content/uploads/specs/552AC_specs.pdf https://zamboni.com/wp-content/uploads/specs/552AC_Lithium-ion_specs.pdf MANUFACTURER’S STATEMENT: This machine is proudly designed and manufactured in Paramount, California by Zamboni Company USA, Inc., a United States company. WARRANTY: Twenty-Four (24) months or 2,000 hours, whichever comes first, parts replacement only. SAFETY STANDARDS: This machine is engineered to meet or exceed OSHA and ANSI safety labeling requirements. In addition to digital safety information, operating instructions and service manuals being provided with the delivery of the machine, all owners/operators have access to all of these materials online at www.zamboni.com to view and download at any time. FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: zamboni.com/machines/model-552ac zamboni.com/options zamboni.com/machines/model-552ac-lithium-ion M_Bauer552AC03.23.26proposal Page 2 of 3 Page 20 of 131 Zamboni 552AC Proposal Zamboni 552AC $ 153,124.00 510 AH Lead Acid Battery with Charger, Aluminum Wheels, Guide Wheel, Black Powder Coated Conditioner, Parking Brake, Conditioner Poly Side Plate, Spare Tire & Wheel Assembly, (2) 77” Blades, Wash Water System w/ Poly Tank, Board Brush ADDITIONAL EQUIPMENT: Single Point Water System for LA Battery $ 1,863.00 Wash water system with poly tank $ Standard Board Brush Assembly $ Standard Standard Water Level Sight Gauge $ 326.03 Tire Wash System $ 1,640.48 Stainless Steel Water Distribution Pipe $ 470.93 Galvanized Conditioner $ 1,268.00 Subtotal $158,692.43 Sourcewell Discount -$4,760.77 Transportation (estimate will be adjusted at time of shipment) $3,500.00 TOTAL $157,431.66 F.O.B: Paramount, California USA TERMS: $25,000.00 deposit with order, balance Net 30 days from date of shipment. Shipment 400 days or sooner from receipt of order. Pricing firm for 30 days. PRICING DOES NOT INCLUDE ANY APPLICABLE SALES TAX THANK YOU: Brandon Radeke March 23, 2026 Brandon Radeke, Date Regional Sales Manager Zamboni Company USA, Inc. 15714 Colorado Ave. Paramount, California 90723 USA Phone: +1 562 633 0751 Fax: +1 562 633 9365 M_Bauer552AC03.23.26proposal Page 3 of 3 Page 21 of 131 STAFF REPORT Meeting Date: May 12, 2026 ROGERS CITY COUNCIL Agenda Item: 5.5 Subject: Approve Second Amendment to May 26, 2020 Trailway Cooperative Agreement with Three Rivers Park District for the grade-separated crossing of CR 144/141st Avenue, City Project No. 2107 Prepared By: Doran Cote, Public Works Director/City Engineer Recommended Council Action Motion to Approve Second Amendment to May 26, 2020 Trailway Cooperative Agreement with Three Rivers Park District for the grade-separated crossing of CR 144/141st Avenue, City Project No. 2107 Overview / Background / Analysis The CSAH 144 pedestrian tunnel between Rogers High School and Middle School had been identified as a priority on the City's Trail Capital Improvement Program and is a project listed on the Local Option Sales Tax Referendum. The pedestrian tunnel would provide a safer connection between the High School and Middle School eliminating the need for pedestrians to have to cross CSAH 144. The pedestrian tunnel had also been identified as a component of the Crow River Regional Trail and Three Rivers Park District has also pledged funding for the construction of the tunnel. Hennepin County has also agreed to fund a portion of the project costs. The latest construction cost estimate from SEH for the pedestrian crossing is $2,064,000. The total estimated cost including contingencies, engineering, surveying and administration is $2,758,000. The total funding identified for the project to date is $750,000 from L.O.S.T., $162,000 from Three Rivers Park District and $175,000 from Hennepin County for a total of $1,087,000. ISD 728 has not committed any funding for this project, and they have declined staff's request to apply for Safe Routes to School grant funding. At the May 30, 2023 City Council Goalsetting this project was rated as the lowest priority L.O.S.T. project. The City and Park District entered into the First Amendment to revise the Park District’s financial contribution for the grade-separated crossing of CR 144/141st Avenue connecting the Rogers Middle and High Schools from $75,000 to 10% of the total project cost up to $160,000. The City has since elected to not complete the project due to project costs and available funding. The Second Amendment terminates the First Amendment and further amends the Agreement to eliminate any City obligation to design, construct and fund the County Road 144/141st Avenue N grade-separated crossing. Page 22 of 131Staff Recommendation Motion to Approve Second Amendment to May 26, 2020 Trailway Cooperative Agreement with Three Rivers Park District for the grade-separated crossing of CR 144/141st Avenue, City Project No. 2107 Financial Impact: $2,758,000 Source Fund: LOST Budgeted? No Supporting Documentation A. 2ndAmendment_CRRT_Rogers Page 23 of 131 CITY OF ROGERS AND THREE RIVERS PARK DISTRICT SECOND AMENDMENT TO MAY 26, 2020 TRAILWAY COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT This Second Amendment (“Second Amendment”) to the Trailway Cooperative Agreement made and entered into on May 26, 2020 (the “Agreement”) and then amended on August 23, 2022 (the “First Amendment”), by and between Three Rivers Park District, a public corporation and a political subdivision of the State of Minnesota (“Park District”), and the City of Rogers, a Minnesota municipal corporation (“City”), is hereby made and entered into this _____ day of ______________ 2026, by and between the Park District and City. WHEREAS, Park District is a political subdivision of the State of Minnesota authorized by statute to acquire, establish, operate and maintain park and trail systems; and WHEREAS, Park District promulgates master plans for the development of park facilities and regional trail systems and submits master plans to the host community(ies) and Metropolitan Council for approval; and WHEREAS, Park District prepared a specific master plan for the Crow River Regional Trail (“Trail”) in cooperation with the City which was subsequently supported by the City with a resolution of support on May 24, 2016, and adopted by the Park District Board of Commissioners on April 20, 2017; and WHEREAS, City and Park District entered into the Agreement for the Trail establishing the planning, design, construction, operation, maintenance, and funding responsibilities of the Trail on May 26, 2020; and WHEREAS, City and Park District entered into the First Amendment to revise the Park District’s financial contribution for the grade-separated crossing of CR 144/141st Avenue (the “Project”) connecting the Rogers Middle and High Schools from $75,000 to 10% of the total project cost up to $160,000; and WHEREAS, City has since elected to not complete the Project due to project costs and available funding and desires to terminate the First Amendment and further amend the Agreement to eliminate any City obligation to design, construct and fund the County Road 144/141st Avenue N grade-separated crossing; and WHEREAS, all other Agreement terms and conditions remain unchanged. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants herein, and other good and valuable consideration, the sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, Park District and City agree as follows: Except as herein provided, the terms, conditions, and provisions of the Agreement shall apply to and govern the provisions of this Second Amendment. 1. Termination of the Second Amendment. The Second Amendment is hereby terminated in its entirety. Second Amendment to the 2020 Trailway Cooperative Agreement 1 Page 24 of 131 2. Design and Construction. Paragraph C(iii.)(b.)(3) of the Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety, and City shall have no obligation to design, construct or fund a grade-separated crossing at County Road 44/141st Avenue N. unless otherwise agreed to at a future date and via an amendment to the Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have entered into this Second Amendment on the day and year first written above. City of Rogers, a Minnesota municipal corporation Date Its Mayor Date Its City Clerk THREE RIVERS PARK DISTRICT, a public corporation and political subdivision of the State of Minnesota Date John Gibbs, Board Chair Date Boe R. Carlson, Superintendent and Secretary to the Board Second Amendment to the 2020 Trailway Cooperative Agreement 2 Page 25 of 131 STAFF REPORT Meeting Date: May 12, 2026 ROGERS CITY COUNCIL Agenda Item: 5.6 Subject: Approve Fleet and Equipment Proposed Changes Prepared By: Doran Cote, Public Works Director/City Engineer Recommended Council Action Motion to Approve Fleet and Equipment Proposed Changes Overview / Background / Analysis The 2026 Capital Equipment Plan includes funding in the amount of $185,000 for replacement of a 1999 Case 621C front end loader. After evaluating the current condition and operational needs of this unit, staff are recommending that the replacement be deferred and that the existing loader be retained for continued use in a reduced capacity. The 1999 Case 621C loader remains in good working condition and recently received $20,000 worth of new tires, which represent a significant investment. Staff believes this unit can continue to serve the city effectively for an additional 10 years as a secondary “yard” loader for loading materials such as salt during winter months and supporting other operations within the Public Works facility. Based on this assessment, replacing the loader at this time is not the most efficient use of capital funds. Staff are requesting authorization to reallocate the budgeted funds toward the purchase of street maintenance equipment that will provide immediate operational value and reduce reliance on contracted services. Specifically, staff proposes the purchase of a used 2018 Weiler P265 asphalt paver from C&S Blacktopping for $45,000. This unit has approximately 4,000 hours of use, has been recently overhauled, and was maintained by a local contractor. The paver is well suited for municipal applications including trail work, patching, and small paving projects, and would allow the city to complete more work in-house. In addition, staff are proposing the purchase of a new crack sealing machine in the amount of $76,705.90 and a new air compressor for crack preparation in the amount of $60,000, both of which would be acquired off the State Contract. The city previously owned a crack sealing unit which was sold a couple of years ago when the city elected to participate in the Joint Powers Agreement (JPA) for crack sealing services. At that time, staff made the decision to utilize the JPA rather than purchase a replacement unit, as it provided an efficient shared service model. The JPA was dissolved last year when Coon Rapids elected to no longer manage the program, leaving the city without access to that service. Replacement of this equipment will restore the city’s ability to perform crack sealing operations internally. Crack sealing is a critical preventative maintenance Page 26 of 131activity that extends pavement life and reduces long-term reconstruction costs. The total proposed reallocation for the paver, crack sealing equipment, and air compressor is $181,705.90, which is within the approved budget amount for the loader replacement. This approach maximizes the value of the allocated funds by addressing immediate operational needs while extending the service life of existing equipment. Approval of this request will allow the Public Works Department to improve efficiency, increase flexibility in scheduling work, and reduce contractor costs associated with routine pavement maintenance and small paving projects. Staff Recommendation Motion to Approve Fleet and Equipment Proposed Changes Financial Impact: $181,705.90 Source Fund: Fund 400 Budgeted? Yes Supporting Documentation None Page 27 of 131 STAFF REPORT Meeting Date: May 12, 2026 ROGERS CITY COUNCIL Agenda Item: 5.7 Subject: Approve Payment to Xcel Energy to Relocate Overhead Power for City Hall and Police Department Civic Campus, City Project No. 2202 Prepared By: Recommended Council Action Motion to Approve Payment to Xcel Energy to Relocate Overhead Power for City Hall and Police Department Civic Campus, City Project No. 2202 Overview / Background / Analysis The proposed site plan includes the construction of a civic campus building of approximately 60,000 square feet. The civic campus would be comprised of City Hall, Council Chambers, and the Police Department. The City Hall and Council Chambers would sit on the east side of the property and the Police Department, and the secured and enclosed parking areas would sit on the west side of the site. The City Hall side of the building would be 1-story while the Police Department offices would be 2-stories in height. The main entrance and primary parking for visitors would front John Deere Lane. Adjacent to the Council Chambers along Main Street includes a plaza space that would be connected via sidewalk to the broader downtown area. The attached narrative and plans more fully describe the proposed improvements. On January 13, 2026 the City Council approved Approve AIA Document A133-2019, Standard Form of Agreement between the City of Rogers and Terra Construction for Construction Manager at Risk (CM@R) for the Police Department/City Hall Civic Campus, City Project No. 2202. On February 10, 2026, the City Council approved the preliminary plat and site plan for the Civic Campus. On April 28, 2026, the City Council approved Bid Package #1 and Bidder Qualification Selection Criteria and authorized solicitation of bids for Bid Package #1. In order to facilitate the construction of the Civic Campus, existing overhead power along the south side of Industrial Boulevard right-of-way must be relocated or buried. Undergrounding the power was considered, but the boulevard area below the power lines currently has watermain, natural gas, two fiberoptic lines and cable buried. Xcel Energy would also require space for a 125 cubic foot vault for equipment. The cost to bury the power was estimated to be at least $300,000. Instead, Xcel Energy proposes to relocate the overhead lines from the south side of Industrial Boulevard into existing utility easements on the north side of Industrial Boulevard then underground from the gas station to the east side of County Road 81. Since the relocation is for convenience, the city has to pay Xcel Energy to relocate the Page 28 of 131power lines. The total estimated cost is $130,386.16 but to initiate the project, Xcel Energy only requires 50% down payment or $65,193.08. Staff Recommendation Motion to Approve Payment to Xcel Energy to Relocate Overhead Power for City Hall and Police Department Civic Campus, City Project No. 2202 Financial Impact: $130,386.16 Source Fund: Bonds, 400 Budgeted? Supporting Documentation A. Xcel Energy Customer Packet B. Xcel Energy Proposed Design Page 29 of 131 STAFF REPORT Meeting Date: May 12, 2026 ROGERS CITY COUNCIL Agenda Item: 5.9 Subject: Approval of the First Amendment to the Purchase Agreement with Cloutier Properties for the Sale of City-Owned Property Setting a Closing Date Prepared By: Brett Angell, Community Development Director Recommended Council Action Motion to approve the First Amendment to the Purchase Agreement setting a closing date with Cloutier Properties for the sale of city-owned property. Overview / Background / Analysis On January 28, 2025, the City of Rogers entered into a purchase agreement with Cloutier Properties for the sale of 1.31 acres of city-owned land at Rogers Drive and 136th Ave. The proposed sale related to the future development of the property into a multi-tenant commercial building of approximately 10,000 square feet. Since that time, the Buyer has completed the necessary due diligence for the site conditions. More recently, the Buyer has submitted land use applications for site plan and variance approval related to the proposed development. The proposed development includes an approximately 9,100 square foot building that would be filled with 3–4 tenants, dependent on finalization of leases. The proposed tenant mixture is anticipated to include two quick-service restaurants and a retail/fitness use. The site plan and variance request are on this agenda (May 12th) for council consideration and approval. The proposed first amendment to the purchase agreement would amend the section related to closing date. The proposed changed language would set a closing date to occur on or before July 1st, 2026. No other sections, including sale price, would be changed with the proposed amendment. This amendment is a minor administrative item that is needed in advance of closing which will be occurring in the near future and construction commencing summer 2026. Staff Recommendation Staff recommend the approval of the First Amendment to the Purchase Agreement with Cloutier Properties corresponding to setting a must-close by date. Financial Impact: Not applicable. Source Fund: Not applicable. Budgeted? N/A Supporting Documentation Page 30 of 131A. First Amendment to Purchase Agreement with Cloutier Properties Page 31 of 131 FIRST AMENDMENT TO PURCHASE AGREEMENT THIS SECOND AMENDMENT is made and entered into this 12th day of May, 2026 (“Effective Date”), by and between the City of Rogers, a Minnesota municipal corporation (the “Seller”) and Cloutier Properties Corporation, a Minnesota corporation (the “Buyer”). RECITALS 1) The Seller is the fee owner of approximately 1.31 acres of real property legally described at Lot 1, Block2 , Diamond Lake Village, Hennepin County, Minnesota and Outlot B, Walter Dehn Commerce Center 5th Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota (collectively referred to as the “Property”). 2) The Seller has agreed to sell and the Buyer has agreed to purchase the Property, following the Buyer’s environmental investigation and testing of the Property, and subject to the additional terms and conditions of the purchase agreement duly executed between the parties on January 28, 2025 (the “Purchase Agreement”). 3) The parties agree to amend the closing date with the land use approval process currently underway and in advance of a closing. NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1) The Closing Date (within Section 7 of the Purchase Agreement) shall be amended from requiring a closing within 14 days after the expiration of the Due Diligence Period to a closing being required to occur on or before July 1, 2026. 2) All other terms of the purchase agreement and any amendments remain binding. [Signatures on following page.] Cloutier1stAmendment Page 32 of 131 BUYER: Cloutier Properties By: ________________________________ Chief Manager SELLER: City of Rogers By: ________________________________ Shannon Klick, Mayor By: ________________________________ Stacie Brown, City Clerk Cloutier1stAmendment Page 33 of 131 STAFF REPORT Meeting Date: May 12, 2026 ROGERS CITY COUNCIL Agenda Item: 5.10 Subject: Approval of the Fifth Amendment to the Purchase Agreement with Jacob Ventures, LLC Granting Additional Time to Close Prepared By: Brett Angell, Community Development Director Recommended Council Action Motion to approve the Fifth Amendment to the Purchase Agreement with Jacon Ventures, LLC granting additional time to close. Overview / Background / Analysis On July 9th, 2024, the City of Rogers entered into a purchase agreement with Jacob Ventures, LLC for the sale of Lot 3, Block 1, Uptown Rogers 3rd Addition for the future construction of a bar and restaurant (Ray Js American Grill). Since that time, the Buyer has completed the soil testing and has received site plan approval for the construction of an approximately 4,400 square foot building. There have been four previous amendments granted to the purchase agreement. The amendments are detailed below: • 1st Amendment — November 25, 2024 — adjustments to the purchase price due to soil correction costs; • 2nd Amendment — March 25, 2025 — adding another 120 days of due diligence timing; • 3rd Amendment — June 24, 2025 — adding another 190 days of due diligence timing; and • 4th Amendment — December 9, 2025 — adding another 121 days of due diligence timing. The proposed fifth amendment to the purchase agreement would add 100 days to the due diligence period, bringing a potential closing to August 20th. This proposed closing date aligns well with the anticipated financial structuring for the restaurant. There are no adjustments to the purchase agreement on any other items proposed besides timing. The Buyer has done a great job of providing regular updates to city staff, and they have expressed a commitment to seeing this project move forward. Additionally, the Buyer is exploring potential enhancements to their development, which would lead to the development being more of a destination for the city. Staff Recommendation Page 34 of 131Staff recommend the approval of the Fifth Amendment to the Purchase Agreement with Jacob Ventures, LLC (DBA Ray Js) granting additional time to close. Financial Impact: Not applicable. Source Fund: Not applicable. Budgeted? N/A Supporting Documentation A. Fifth Amendment to Purchase Agreement Page 35 of 131 FIFTH AMENDMENT TO PURCHASE AGREEMENT THIS FIFTH AMENDMENT is made and entered into this 12th day of May, 2026 (“Effective Date”), by and between the City of Rogers, a Minnesota municipal corporation (the “Seller”) and Jacob Ventures, LLC., a Minnesota limited liability company (the “Buyer”). RECITALS 1) The Seller is the fee owner of approximately 2.72 acres of real property legally described at Lot 3, Block 1, Uptown Rogers 3rd Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota (the “Property”). 2) The Seller has agreed to sell and the Buyer has agreed to purchase the Property, following the Buyer’s environmental investigation and testing of the Property, and subject to the additional terms and conditions of the purchase agreement duly executed between the parties on July 9, 2024 (the “Purchase Agreement”). 3) The Seller and Buyer agreed to a First Amendment to the Purchase Agreement on November 25, 2024 adjusting the purchase price due to soil correction costs. 4) The Seller and Buyer agreed to a Second Amendment to the Purchase Agreement on March 25, 2025 adding an additional 120 days of due diligence timing. 5) The Seller and Buyer agreed to a Third Amendment to the Purchase Agreement on June 24, 2025 adding an additional 190 days of due diligence timing. 6) The Seller and Buyer agreed to a Fourth Amendment to the Purchase Agreement on December 9, 2025, allowing for an additional 121 days of due diligence timing. 7) The parties agree to amend the Due Diligence timing of the agreement to allow the Buyer sufficient time to finalize construction contracts and financing for the development and to explore additional amenities to be added to the proposed restaurant. NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1) The Due Diligence Period (Section 5 of the Purchase Agreement) shall be amended to allow for an additional one hundred (100) days of additional due diligence timing from the date of this amendment The new expiration shall be August 20, 2026. 2) All other terms of the purchase agreement and any amendments remain binding. [Signatures on following page.] RayJs5thAmendment Page 36 of 131 BUYER: Jacob Ventures, LLC By: ________________________________ Mark Jacob, President SELLER: City of Rogers By: ________________________________ Shannon Klick, Mayor By: ________________________________ Stacie Brown, City Clerk RayJs5thAmendment Page 37 of 131 STAFF REPORT Meeting Date: May 12, 2026 ROGERS CITY COUNCIL Agenda Item: 5.11 Subject: Authorize Execution of Early Grading Agreement for Northview Preserve 2nd Addition. Prepared By: Alec Henderson, City Planner Recommended Council Action Motion to authorize the execution of an early grading agreement for Northview Preserve 2nd Addition contingent upon the receipt of financial guarantee and required grading permits. Overview / Background / Analysis Summergate Development received preliminary plat approval for the subdivision of the22885 Territorial Rd for a 10-lot single-family residential development (Northview Preserve 2nd Addition). The Council approved the preliminary plat by Resolution 2026- 34 on April 14, 2026. The developer is requesting early grading authorization, which is permissable with an approved preliminary plat provided they execute an early grading agreement and provide a financial surety. Staff request City Council authorization for the city to enter into an early grading agreement for Northview Preserve 2nd Addition. The Final Plat application has been submitted, and the Council will see final construction plans in the near future. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends authorization of the agreement and allowing early grading upon receipt of financial guarantee for the grading work. Financial Impact: Not applicable. Source Fund: Not applicable. Budgeted? N/A Supporting Documentation A. Early_Grading_Agreement_Northview_Preserve_2nd_Addition Page 38 of 131 AGREEMENT ALLOWING EARLY DEVELOPMENT GRADING This AGREEMENT ALLOWING EARLY DEVELOPMENT GRADING (“Agreement”) is made this _____ day of __________, 2026 by and between the City of Rogers, a municipal corporation under the laws of Minnesota (“City”), and Summergate Companies LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company (“Developer”). RECITALS A. The Developer is proposing to construct a 10-lot single-family residential subdivision development, called Northview Preserve 2nd Addition, consisting of single-family homes (“Development”), located on one property (PIDs: 22-120-23-33-0004) (“Subject Property”) located at 22885 Territorial Road. B. The Preliminary Plat for the Development was approved by the City Council on April 14, 2026 per Resolution 2026-34 (“Preliminary Plat”). C. The Developer anticipates approval of the Final Plat for the Development and Developer shall enter one (1) or more agreements with the City governing the Development including, but not limited to, a Subdivision Agreement with each phase of the Development, which will set-forth certain requirements and obligations relating to the installation of certain public improvements, including, but not limited to, grading, streets and utilities, landscaping, trails and sidewalks. D. Prior to entering any agreements governing the Development, the Developer has requested authorization to commence early grading (“Grading Work”), which shall include the mass grading of the development area that were a part of the preliminary plat. In consideration of the mutual covenants and promises contained herein, the parties hereto agree and stipulate as follows: AGREEMENT 1. Permit. Contemporaneous with the execution of this Agreement, Developer shall submit a grading permit application to the Public Works Department for review and approval and pay the appropriate permit fees, and Developer shall provide a copy of its National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit and watershed district approval authorizing the proposed grading activities. All grading activities shall be subject to, and completed in conformance with, the grading permit, NPDES permit, and watershed district approval. Approval is contingent upon receipt of a WCA approved wetland replacement plan. 2. Security. The Developer shall deposit with the City security, in the form of a cash deposit or letter of credit, ensuring that the Developer completes grading, erosion control and other related early improvements according to the applicable permits and approved plans for the Development. The security amount shall be 125% of the Engineer’s Estimate (shown in Exhibit A) for the Grading Work as provided by the Developer and reviewed and approved by the City Engineer. If security is provided by Letter of Credit, said Letter shall conform to City policy and 1 Page 39 of 131 shall be reviewed and approved by the Finance Director and City Attorney. The Letter of Credit Amount is shown in Exhibit B. 3. Effect and Entire Agreement. This Agreement contains the entire understanding of the parties regarding the Grading Work, but does not impact, amend or replace any Master Development Agreement, Subdivision Agreement, or any other agreement which may be entered with respect to the Development. Nothing herein constitutes an approval, or a promise or assurance of any other approval, related to the Development, including specific approval of any Final Plat thereof. No modifications to this Agreement shall be in effect unless reduced to writing and signed by the all of the parties. 4. Miscellaneous. a. The Developer shall pay all costs incurred by it, or the City, in conjunction with the grading of the Property, including but not limited to legal, planning, engineering, and inspection expenses incurred in connection with approval and acceptance of the work, review of plans and documents, and all costs and expenses incurred by the City in monitoring the grading of the Subject Property. b. The Developer will provide for construction inspection and material testing for the grading of the Property. The Developer shall instruct its engineer to provide full-time field inspection personnel in order for the Developer's engineer to be able to certify that the construction work meets the approved City standards as a condition of City acceptance. In addition, the City may, at the City's discretion and at the Developer's expense, have one or more City inspectors inspect the work on a full or part-time basis. The Developer, its contractors and subcontractors, shall follow all instructions received from the City's inspectors. The Developer and/or the Developer's engineer shall provide for on-site project management. c. The Developer shall hold harless the City and its officials, employees, and agents from claims made by themselves and third parties for damages sustained or costs incurred resulting from this grading approval. The Developer shall indemnify the City and its officials, employees, and agents for all costs, damages, or expenses which the City may pay or incur in consequence of such claims, including attorneys' fees. d. The Developer agrees to obtain and maintain until after completion of the work under this Agreement, public liability and property damage insurance coverage covering personal injury, including death, and claims for property damage which may arise out of the Developer’s work or the work of its contractors or subcontractors. Liability limits shall not be less than $1,500,000 for any number of claims arising out of a single occurrence. The City shall be named as an additional insured on the policy. The certificate of insurance shall provide that the City must be given the same advance written notice of the cancellation or nonrenewal of the insurance as is afforded to the Developer. e. The Developer shall reimburse the City for costs incurred in the enforcement of this Agreement, including reasonable engineering and attorneys' fees. 2 Page 40 of 131 f. The Developer shall pay in full all bills submitted by the City for obligations incurred under this Agreement within 30 days after receipt. Upon request, the City will provide copies of detailed invoices of the work performed. g. The Developer agrees to comply with all laws, ordinances, regulations, and directives of the State of Minnesota and the City applicable to the Subject Property. This Agreement shall be construed according to the laws of Minnesota. h. In the event that any provision of this Agreement shall be held invalid, illegal, or unenforceable by any court of competent jurisdiction, such holding shall pertain only to such section and shall not invalidate or render unenforceable any other provision of this Agreement. i. This Agreement may be executed simultaneously in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be an original and shall constitute one and the same Agreement IN WITNESS OF THE ABOVE, the duly authorized representatives of the parties have caused this Agreement to be executed in duplicate on the date and year written above. SUMMERGATE COMPANIES, LLC CITY OF ROGERS By__________________________ By___________________________ Casey Wollschlager, Shannon Klick Summergate Companies, LLC 17505 Cedar Ave S, Lakeville, MN 55044 Ste 200 Its: Manager By___________________________ Stacie Brown Its Clerk THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: City of Rogers 22350 South Diamond Lake Road Rogers MN 55374 (763) 428-2253 3 Page 41 of 131 EXHIBIT A GRADING ESTIMATE 4 Page 42 of 131 EXHIBIT B SECURITY AMOUNT ESTIMATE SURETY GRADING $56,443.00 125% EROSION CONTROL $15,698.00 125% TOTAL $72,141.00 $90,176.00 5 Page 43 of 131 STAFF REPORT Meeting Date: May 12, 2026 ROGERS CITY COUNCIL Agenda Item: 5.12 Subject: Authorize Execution of Early Grading Agreement for Cowley Lake Preserve 2nd Addition Area Prepared By: Alec Henderson, City Planner Recommended Council Action Motion to Authorize Execution of the Early Grading Agreement for Cowley Lake Preserve Phase 2 Overview / Background / Analysis Rachel Development, inc. has requested early grading approval for phase 2 of the Cowley Lake Preserve Development. Phase 2 grading includes the area of the next 71 lots of the Cowley Lake Preserve development. Early grading can occur after preliminary plat approval with a signed agreement, letter of credit for 125% of the value of the work, and a grading permit. Staff recommends authorizing execution of the early grading agreement for Cowley Lake Preserve phase 2. A Final Plat request for phase 2 and the Subdivision Agreement related to streets and utilities will be forthcoming. Staff Recommendation Motion to Authorize Execution of the Early Grading Agreement for Cowley Lake Preserve Phase 2 Financial Impact: Not applicable. Source Fund: Not applicable. Budgeted? N/A Supporting Documentation A. Early_Grading_Agreement_Cowley_Lake_Preserve_2nd_Addition Page 44 of 131 AGREEMENT ALLOWING EARLY DEVELOPMENT GRADING This AGREEMENT ALLOWING EARLY DEVELOPMENT GRADING (“Agreement”) is made this _____ day of __________, 2026 by and between the City of Rogers, a municipal corporation under the laws of Minnesota (“City”), and Rachel Development, inc., a Minnesota Corporation (“Developer”). RECITALS A. The Developer is proposing to construct a 71-lot single-family residential subdivision development, called Cowley Lake Preserve 2nd Addition, consisting of single-family homes (“Development”), the second phase of a multiple phase project totaling 156 lots, located on the properties identified as PIDs: 21-120-23-24-0005, 21-120-23-13-0004, and approximately 20 acres of 21-120-23-11-0003 (“Subject Property) north and east of Territorial Road and east of Willandale Road. B. The Preliminary Plat for the Development was approved by the City Council on July 8, 2025 per Resolution 2025-30A (“Preliminary Plat”). C. The Developer anticipates approval of the Final Plat for the Development and Developer shall enter into one (1) or more agreements with the City governing the Development including, but not limited to, a Subdivision Agreement with each phase of the Development, which will set-forth certain requirements and obligations relating to the installation of certain public improvements, including, but not limited to, grading, streets and utilities, landscaping, trails and sidewalks. D. Prior to entering any agreements governing the Development, the Developer has requested authorization to commence early grading (“Grading Work”), which shall include the mass grading of the development area that were a part of the preliminary plat. In consideration of the mutual covenants and promises contained herein, the parties hereto agree and stipulate as follows: AGREEMENT 1. Permit. Contemporaneous with the execution of this Agreement, Developer shall submit a grading permit application to the Public Works Department for review and approval and pay the appropriate permit fees, and Developer shall provide a copy of its National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit and watershed district approval authorizing the proposed grading activities. All grading activities shall be subject to, and completed in conformance with, the grading permit, NPDES permit, and watershed district approval. Approval is contingent upon receipt of a WCA approved wetland replacement plan. 1 Page 45 of 1312. Security. The Developer shall deposit with the City security, in the form of a cash deposit or letter of credit, ensuring that the Developer completes grading, erosion control and other related early improvements according to the applicable permits and approved plans for the Development. The security amount shall be 125% of the Engineer’s Estimate (shown in Exhibit A) for the Grading Work as provided by the Developer and reviewed and approved by the City Engineer. If security is provided by Letter of Credit, said Letter shall conform to City policy and shall be reviewed and approved by the Finance Director and City Attorney. The Letter of Credit Amount is shown in Exhibit B. 3. Effect and Entire Agreement. This Agreement contains the entire understanding of the parties regarding the Grading Work, but does not impact, amend or replace any Master Development Agreement, Subdivision Agreement, or any other agreement which may be entered with respect to the Development. Nothing herein constitutes an approval, or a promise or assurance of any other approval, related to the Development, including specific approval of any Final Plat thereof. No modifications to this Agreement shall be in effect unless reduced to writing and signed by the all of the parties. 4. Miscellaneous. a. The Developer shall pay all costs incurred by it, or the City, in conjunction with the grading of the Property, including but not limited to legal, planning, engineering, and inspection expenses incurred in connection with approval and acceptance of the work, review of plans and documents, and all costs and expenses incurred by the City in monitoring the grading of the Subject Property. b. The Developer shall hold harmless the City and its officials, employees, and agents from claims made by themselves and third parties for damages sustained or costs incurred resulting from this grading approval. The Developer shall indemnify the City and its officials, employees, and agents for all costs, damages, or expenses which the City may pay or incur in consequence of such claims, including attorneys' fees. c. The Developer agrees to obtain and maintain until after completion of the work under this Agreement, public liability and property damage insurance coverage covering personal injury, including death, and claims for property damage which may arise out of the Developer’s work or the work of its contractors or subcontractors. Liability limits shall not be less than $1,500,000 for any number of claims arising out of a single occurrence. The City shall be named as an additional insured on the policy. The certificate of insurance shall provide that the City must be given the same advance written notice of the cancellation or nonrenewal of the insurance as is afforded to the Developer. d. The Developer shall reimburse the City for costs incurred in the enforcement of this Agreement, including reasonable engineering and attorneys' fees. e. The Developer shall pay in full all bills submitted by the City for obligations incurred under this Agreement within 30 days after receipt. Upon request, the City will provide copies of detailed invoices of the work performed. 2 Page 46 of 131 f. The Developer agrees to comply with all laws, ordinances, regulations, and directives of the State of Minnesota and the City applicable to the Subject Property. This Agreement shall be construed according to the laws of Minnesota. g. In the event that any provision of this Agreement shall be held invalid, illegal, or unenforceable by any court of competent jurisdiction, such holding shall pertain only to such section and shall not invalidate or render unenforceable any other provision of this Agreement. h. This Agreement may be executed simultaneously in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be an original and shall constitute one and the same Agreement IN WITNESS OF THE ABOVE, the duly authorized representatives of the parties have caused this Agreement to be executed in duplicate on the date and year written above. RACHEL DEVELOPMENT, INC. CITY OF ROGERS By__________________________ By___________________________ David Stradtman, Shannon Klick Rachel Development, inc. 4180 Napier Ct NE, St. Michael, MN 55376 Its: VP of Development By___________________________ Stacie Brown Its Clerk THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: City of Rogers 22350 South Diamond Lake Road Rogers MN 55374 (763) 428-2253 3 Page 47 of 131 EXHIBIT A GRADING ESTIMATE 4 Page 48 of 131 EXHIBIT B SECURITY AMOUNT ESTIMATE SURETY GRADING $301,750.00 125% EROSION CONTROL $113,740.00 125% TOTAL $415,490.00 $519,362.50 5 Page 49 of 131 STAFF REPORT Meeting Date: May 12, 2026 ROGERS CITY COUNCIL Agenda Item: 6.1 Subject: Public Hearing to identify Qualified 501(c)(3) Users of the Rogers Activity Center in the City of Rogers Prepared By: Bridget Bruska, Finance Director Recommended Council Action Conduct Public Hearing to identify Qualified 501(c)(3) Users of the Rogers Activity Center in the City of Rogers - No Formal Motion Required Overview / Background / Analysis On February 4, 2026, the City Council accepted bids for the Rogers Activity Center (RAC) Expansion, City Project #2406. The project includes construction of a second sheet of ice between the existing Rogers Activity Center and the HealthPartners Fieldhouse, completing the TruStone Center. As previously discussed, the project will be financed through several funding sources, including the issuance of bonds. Because certain nonprofit organizations are expected to enter into long-term use agreements for the expanded facility, a portion of the bonds are anticipated to qualify as 501 (c)(3) bonds under federal tax law. At a high level, 501(c)(3) bonds are tax-exempt bonds that may be issued for facilities used by qualified nonprofit organizations for charitable or public purposes. Prior to issuing bonds with this designation, federal law requires the City to hold a public hearing. The hearing provides residents and interested parties an opportunity to comment on the proposed financing and the anticipated use of the facility by qualifying nonprofit organizations. The Public Hearing needs to be conducted as a formality; there is no resolution or action to approve. The formal action will be taken within the bond sale resolution, which is scheduled for June 9, 2026. Staff Recommendation Conduct Public Hearing to identify Qualified 501(c)(3) Users of the Rogers Activity Center in the City of Rogers. Financial Impact: N/A Source Fund: N/A Budgeted? N/A Page 50 of 131Supporting Documentation None Page 51 of 131 STAFF REPORT Meeting Date: May 12, 2026 ROGERS CITY COUNCIL Agenda Item: 7.1 Subject: Approval of Resolution 2026-49 Approving a Site Plan and Variance Request for a Retail Center at 21355 136th Ave (Lot Adjacent to Maynards) by Cloutier Properties Prepared By: Brett Angell, Community Development Director Overview / Background / Analysis In 2025, the City of Rogers entered into a purchase agreement with Cloutier Properties ("Developer" or "Buyer") for the sale of city-owned property at 21355 136th Ave. The purchase agreement corresponded to the future development of the site into a new multi-tenant commercial building of approximately 10,000 square feet. The proposed development and site plan under consideration corresponds to this sale. The Developer has been pre-leasing to tenants and has had solid interest from prospective tenants. No leases have been signed to date, but there is an expectation the building will be fully leased around the time construction is completed of the building shell. With the proposed development and property sale, the Developer and Theilen and Green Architecture (collectively referred to as the "Applicant") have submitted a site plan and variance request to the city for consideration. The proposed development includes the construction of a new multi-tenant commercial building of approximately 9,100 square feet that would be separated into four (4) tenant spaces. Of the four tenant spaces, it is anticipated that it will include two fast casual restaurants (one of which would have a drive-thru), a take-out space, and a retail/office tenant. Property Details The Subject Property is currently comprised of two parcels totaling approximately 1.31 acres and is located at the intersection of Rogers Drive and 136th Avenue, directly adjacent to Maynards restaurant. The property was originally acquired by the City of Rogers in 2006 for future city facility consideration. However, it was determined that the site would no longer be needed for future city functions. The site has not been developed in the past and has been maintained as an open grass area for the past several decades. Directly to the east of the Subject Property includes excess right-of-way from a point in time at which the roads in the area were re-aligned. As a part of this development request, the excess right-of-way will be vacated and incorporated into the development parcel. The excess right-of-way provides additional opportunities for signage or other related development needs. Page 52 of 131Zoning and Guidance The Subject Property is zoned as RC - Regional Employment Center and guided as commercial within the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. The proposed use as a multi-tenant commercial building is consistent with the zoning and guidance for the property. The listed tenant uses are all consistent with the zoning and guidance as well. Adjacent uses to all sides include various commercial uses including: Maynards restaurant to the west, 21st Century Bank to the north, multi-tenant commercial (medical offices) to the east, and stormwater ponds and Dairy Queen to the south. The proposed building meets all required building setback distances. The proposed development requires a setback to the required parking setbacks, as this property is within the corridor overlay district which has a 20 ft parking setback for front and side yards. Details related to the variance request can be found below. The proposed development meets all other zoning code requirements for landscaping, building height, and architectural materials. Site Plan Details The proposed development includes an approximately 9,100 square foot building sitting fairly centralized on the site. The front face of the building would face towards the east (towards Rogers Drive). Parking is situated around the edges of the site. The southern tenant space would be structured to allow for a drive-thru and stacking for the drive-thru would occur on the rear side of the building. The design for the drive-thru allows for the stacking of over 12 cars before impacting any drive lanes. The northern tenant space includes a small space for an outdoor patio space. The trash enclosure is located on the southwest corner of the property. The north, east, and south drive aisles would allow for two-way traffic. The west (rear) drive lane would be a one-way, abutting the angled parking. The proposed drive lane widths meet the city standards for width. Parking and Access The proposed development includes two access points on the north and south sides of the property. The access points are pushed as far to the west as possible to ensure proper truck turning movements within the site. The proposed access points and truck turning movements exhibit have been reviewed by the Fire Department and they are comfortable with the proposed design. The proposed development has a total of 93 parking stalls, five of which would be ADA- accessible and in the front of the building. Most of the stalls are located in the front and sides of the building for visitors/customers. Twenty of the stalls provided would be angled in the rear of the building, which are anticipated to be utilized primarily by the employees of the businesses. The proposed number of stalls is consistent with code requirements as the city code includes a provision corresponding to the total number of stalls being reduced for developments with cross parking agreements. Stormwater Management Page 53 of 131This area is served via regional stormwater pounding, which will be utilized for this development and has adequate capacity. The development will have to meet all rules and regulations as required by the Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission (ECWMC). The development exceeds the 1-acre threshold for disturbance and will have to receive ECWMC approval. A copy of the stormwater management plan is included with this item. Architecture The proposed architecture includes a mix of brick, glazing, stone veneer, EIFS, and precast and metal accents. The colors are primarily different tones of gray. The proposed materials are consistent on all sides of the building. At its top height, the building would be about 22 feet in height, below the maximum height restriction. The proposed materials are consistent with the corridor overlay district standards. Landscaping The applicant is proposing to plant 20 trees along with additional shrubs and grasses. The trees are primarily focused on the north and south sides of the property. The site is currently undeveloped and there are no trees that would be removed as part of this development, so all would be newly planted. The proposed landscaping meets the requirements of city code. Variance Request The applicant is requesting a variance from the 20-ft parking setback on the north, south, and east property lines. The proposed variance would allow for a 10-ft parking setback from the south and north property lines and a 0-ft setback, at the minimum point, from the west. The requested parking setback variances are related to the irregular shape of the lot, multiple street frontages, and the existing right-of-way around the building allowing for a greater perceived setback. If the variance is granted, the south parking lot setback from the curb would be at approximately 25 feet. The north would be 20 feet, and the west would be at about 22 feet, at its closest points. The proposed distances would be aligned with many nearby properties, many of which have parking setback under 10 feet from property lines. Variance requests require the Planning Commission to make findings of fact that the proposed variance is consistent with the regulations and criteria as defined in City Code section 125-42. This includes that the variances are in harmony with the comprehensive plan, there are non-economic practical difficulties present, and the circumstances requiring the variance are unique to the property and not created by the owner. Variance requests are reviewed on their own merits. Each request should be considered if it meets the code provisions for granting variances. Key factors in approving variances can be simplified to: Does the proposal put the property to use in a reasonable manner? Are there unique circumstances to the property? If the variance is granted, would it alter the essential character of the locality? Planning Commission Review A public hearing was held and this item was reviewed at the May 4th Planning Page 54 of 131Commission meeting. No individuals spoke at the public hearing. Planning Commission discussion focused primarily on clarifications of the variance request and information on pedestrian connectivity for the area. The Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the variance and site plan request. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends the approval of Resolution 2026-49 approving the site plan and variance request for a retail center at 21355 136th Ave by Cloutier Properties, subject to the terms and conditions as listed in the resolution. Financial Impact: Not applicable. Source Fund: Not applicable. Budgeted? N/A Supporting Documentation A. Resolution No. 2026-49 136th Ave Site Plan and Variance B. Narrative C. Variance Narrative D. Civil and Architectural Plans E. Stormwater Management Plan Page 55 of 131 RESOLUTION NO. 2026-49 APPROVING A SITE PLAN AND VARIANCES RELATED TO CLOUTIER PROPERTIES MULTI-TENANT RETAIL DEVELOPMENT LOCATED AT 21355 136th AVENUE WHEREAS, Theilen and Green and Cloutier Properties (collectively referred to as “Applicant”) have submitted applications to the City of Rogers (“City”), requesting approval of a Site Plan and Variances for a development on the property located at 21355 136th Avenue. The proposed development includes an approximately 9,100 square feet multi-tenant commercial building as depicted in Exhibit B. The proposed variances are related to parking setbacks; and WHEREAS, the property is 1.31 acres and zoned Regional Employment Center (RC), located at 21355 136th Avenue and legally described in Exhibit A (“Subject Property”) (PIDs: 14-120-23- 42-0015 and 14-120-23-42-0021); and WHEREAS, section 125-27 – Site Plan governs the procedures around site plan review processes, and subsection (b) states: “the Planning Commission shall evaluate the effects of the proposed site plans. This review shall be based upon, but not be limited to, compliance with the City’s Comprehensive Plan and provisions of this Ordinance”; and WHEREAS, the proposed use at the Subject Property for a multi-tenant commercial building comprised of an quick service restaurants, take out, and retail use are permitted uses in the RC zoning district (§125-50 Table 4E); and WHEREAS, the proposed development includes an approved parking plan of 93 total spaces allocated via City Code 125-86 Parking. All parking shall be utilized as open to customers of any on-site tenant; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Minnesota Statute §462.357, the Planning Commission (“Commission”) held a Public Hearing (“Hearing”) on May 4th, 2026, to consider and receive public comment on the variance requests; and WHEREAS, notice of the Hearing was posted, published in the City’s official newspaper, mailed to any and all owners of affected properties, as required by State Statute; and, WHEREAS, on May 4th, 2026, the Commission reviewed the request and voted unanimously to recommend approval to the City Council of the Site Plan Review, with the following conditions: a. Applicant entering into all required agreements with the City prior to issuance of a building permit. b. All engineering and community development comments shall be satisfied prior to construction. c. Any necessary Elm Creek Watershed Permitting and Requirements shall be met prior to construction. 1 Page 56 of 131 d. SAC Determination shall be submitted to the Metropolitan Council and all building and connection fees paid prior to issuance of the building permit. e. The applicant shall receive approval for the vacation of public right-of-way directly adjacent to the property to be included in the overall development site. f. Applicant shall provide striping for individuals to cross the drive-thru aisleway. g. One-way signage shall be placed or marked near the northwest side of the property for the rear of the building. h. The trash enclosure shall match the general aesthetic of the principal structure. i. Permits shall be required to be issued within one year of the date of this approval or an extension to these approvals granted by the City Council. WHEREAS, following the Hearing, the Commission recommended approval of the variance requests for the parking setback and impervious surface requirements provided based on the following findings of fact: 1. The subject property is legally described as found in Exhibit A; and 2. The Applicant has applied to the City for variances to City Code 125-57 related to the required 20-foot parking setback; and 3. The proposal would vary from the Code requirement via providing a 10-foot parking setback on the north and south sides and a 0-foot parking setback on the north side of the property; and 4. Following a public hearing on the application, the Rogers Planning Commission has recommended approval of the variance on May 4, 2026; and 5. The City Council of the City of Rogers reviewed the requested variance at its May 12th, 2026, meeting; and 6. Variances are guided by applicable State Statute Section 462.357 Subd. 6 and City Ordinance Section 125-42(c); and 7. The Applicant is in conformance with the existing neighboring properties due to the existing conditions of many of these properties being below the required setback; and 8. The Property has an effective 20-foot setback from back of curb to the property line due to the public right-of-way adjacent to this location; 9. The property is bound by roads on three of the sides and other structuring of the development would not be feasible; 10. The Property is served by regional stormwater systems which have the capacity to handle the excess impervious surface. 11. The Variance is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of City Code and is consistent with the character of other uses in the zoning district. 12. There are practical non-economic difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance, and the Variance is the result of circumstances caused by the City Code requirements related to the development. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROGERS, MINNESOTA, the Site Plan Review and Variance requests from Cloutier Properties are hereby approved for the proposed multi-tenant commercial building of approximately 9,100 square feet at 21355 136th Avenue, and variances from City Code 125-57 related to the reduction of the parking setback from 20 feet to 10 feet on the south and north side of the property and 2 Page 57 of 131reduction of the parking setback from 20 feet to 0 feet on the east side of the property, based on the conditions found in this resolution. Moved by Councilmember , seconded by Councilmember The following voted in favor of said resolution: The following voted against the same: The following abstained: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted, and was signed by the Mayor, and attested by the City Clerk dated this 4th day of May, 2026. __________________________________ Shannon Klick, Mayor ATTEST: __________________________________________ Stacie Brown, City Clerk 3 Page 58 of 131 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION Subject Property LOT 1, BLOCK 2, DIAMOND LAKE VILLAGE, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA AND OUTLOT B, WALTER DEHN COMMERCE CENTER 5TH ADDITION, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA Abstract Property PIDs #14-120-23-42-0021 and 14-120-23-42-0015 4 Page 59 of 131EXHIBIT B SITE PLAN 5 Page 60 of 131Legal Description: Lot 1, Block 2 Diamond Lake Village and Outlot B Walter Dehn Commerce Center 5th Addition according to the plat thereof on file and in the office of the County Recorder of Hennepin County, Minnesota Narrative of the Project: The existing vacant lot located at 21355 136th Ave N. Rogers, MN is the site for a new +/- 9,620 SF single-story retail building for four (4) retail tenants and a drive thru “pickup window”. The current site is undeveloped grass field; and we are looking to revitalize the area by providing a new building that is complementary in both look and use. As the property is located in the RC – Regional Employment Center zoning district that allows all permitted, permitted accessory, or conditional uses contained in Sec 125-67 of the zoning code; as the tenant services that would occupy the building would include retail sales, personal service businesses, and essential services. For the site layout the new building will be placed toward the center of the lot to allow site access on both sides of the property and allow maximum flow around the site. A drive thru “pickup” window is proposed to the South side as there is a shift in fast-casual dining as more customers use online apps to place orders ahead of time. As a result we are seeing a new concept being developed by those types of tenants that allow customers to notify their arrival and pick up their pre-made order at the window, reducing congestion on-site as there will not be a waiting period for the order to be made. The proposed drive thru includes a menu board and minimum 5 que stacking for vehicles. The proposed building’s exterior façade will be a mixture of brick, stone, EIFS, and glazing with metal awning accents that provide a modern appeal to the retail building, while also including outdoor patio area for seating with landscaping along the east elevation facing Rogers Drive. The trash enclosure will occupy the northwest corner of the lot and will be finished in a complimentary material in brick and stone matching the building. Page 61 of 131 Page 62 of 131Legal Description: Lot 1, Block 2 Diamond Lake Village and Outlot B Walter Dehn Commerce Center 5th Addition according to the plat thereof on file and in the office of the County Recorder of Hennepin County, Minnesota Narrative of the Project: The existing vacant lot located at 21355 136th Ave N. Rogers, MN is the site for a new +/- 9,620 SF single-story retail building for four (4) retail tenants and a drive thru “pickup window”. The current site is undeveloped grass field; and we are looking to revitalize the area by providing a new building that is complementary in both look and use. We are requesting a variance from the 20-foot parking setback requirement on the north, south and eastern property line and the 10-foot setback requirement on the west property line. Due to the irregular corner lot with roadways on 3 sides of the building, a 20-foot set back is a hardship on the site. Strict enforcement would result in losing 10% of the required parking. We are proposing a 10-foot setback on both the north and south property line and a 5-foot set back on the west property line. Due to the irregular shape of the site at the corner of Rogers Dr. We are requesting a 0-foot setback at the corners of the triangular shaped wedge as shown on the site plan. This would still allow parking to be 30’ from the curb line. Page 63 of 131 Page 64 of 131SITE GIS DATA SITE PLAN NOTES ZONING: RC - REGIONAL EMPLOYMENT CENTER PARKING THE FOLLOWING USES ARE PERMITTED WITHIN THIS DISTRICT: • STALL SIZE = 9'-0" X 18'-0" a. COMMERCIAL AND OFFICE USES • DRIVE AISLES = 26'-0" b. RESTAURANT • REQUIREMENTS: a. MAX IMPERVIOUS = 75% 1. DINING (SEATING): 1 SPACE FOR EACH 40 SF OF FLOOR AREA b. MAX HEIGHT = 45'-0" MAX 2. DINING (TAKE-OUT): 1 SPACE FOR EACH 15 SF OF FLOOR AREA c. BUILDING SETBACKS 3. KITCHEN: 1 SPACE FOR EACH 80 SF OF FLOOR AREA • FRONT = 30'-0" MIN 4. RETAIL: 1 SPACE FOR EACH 200 SF OF FLOOR AREA • SIDE = 10'-0" MIN OR 30'-0" MIN. AT STREET 5. OFFICE/ BUSINESS: 1 SPACE FOR EACH 200 SF OF FLOOR AREA • REAR = 20'-0" 6. HEALTH/FITNESS CLUB: 1 SPACE FOR EACH 200 SF OF FLOOR AREA • PARKING = 7. MEDICAL/DENTAL CLINIC: 6 SPACES PER DOCTOR 1. FRONT = 20'-0" 2. SIDE = 20'-0" ESTIMATED REQUIRED PARKING: 128 3. SIDE = 20'-0" PROVIDED PARKING: 93 4. REAR = 10'-0" PARKING CAN BE REDUCED TO NOT LESS THAN 60% OVERALL FOR SHARED PARKING CITY STAMP AREA 7455 VILLAGE DRIVE, SUITE #110 LINO LAKES, MN 55014 763 -553 -7927 WWW.TANDGARCH.COM PROPERTY LINE 16505 75TH AVENUE NORTH MAPLE GROVE, MN 55311 763 -234 -8108 20 STALLS 18 ' - 0" " - 0 9' TRASH 12' - 6" ENCLOSURE MENU BOARD ONE WAY DIRECTIONAL SIGN 26' - 0" DRIVETHRU 9' - 0" 10' - 0" 3' - 6 7/8" 26' - 0" SPRINK./ UTILITY FAST CASUAL +/- 2,552 SF 26' - 0" FAST CASUAL +/- 2,409 SF RETAIL/BUSINESS +/- 2,364 SF TAKE-OUT +/- 1,754 SF DINING PARKING (ASSUME ROGERS, MN DINING PARKING (ASSUME 900 SF): 1/40 = 22.5 RETAIL: 1/200 LOBBY PARKING (ASSUME 5 STALLS 1,000SF): 1/40 = 25 KITCHEN PARKING (ASSUME 19' - 0" 150 SF): 1/15 = 10 KITCHEN PARKING (ASSUME 1,652 SF): 1/80 = 20.65 8 STALLS 1,409SF): 1/80 = 17.6 TOTAL REQUIRED: 11.8 KITCHEN PARKING (ASSUME 1,604 SF): 1/80 = 20 TOTAL REQUIRED: 43.15 POTENTIAL TOTAL REQUIRED: 42.6 9' - 0" TOTAL REQUIRED: 30 DRIVE-THRU OR PICK UP ELM CREEK CENTER WINDOW PROPERTY LINE TOTAL BUILDING: 9,725 GSF 4' - 0" 12' - 2 13/16" OUTDOOR RAIL PATIO ISSUE DATE 11 STALLS 10' - 0" (627 SF) OR 2 CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN 02/18/26 9 STALLS ADDITIONAL PARKING CONCEPTUAL PLAN & ELEVATIONS 03/11/26 SPACES PERMIT & BID SET TBD 17 STALLS ? TBD ? TBD PROPERTY LINE 20' - 0" PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 1 '0 - 0 /1 23 STALLS 2" REVISION SCHEDULE NO. DESCRIPTION DATE MONUMENT SIGN NE Y LI ERT P ROP RO P PE RT Y L INE CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN Project Number 498 Date 03/19/2026 Drawn By ? Checked By ? EX01 CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN 1 1/16" = 1'-0" Scale 1/16" = 1'-0" 4/27/2026 10:19:11 AM Page 65 of 131 T.O. LOW PARAPET 119' - 5" 25 23 18 25 4.8" 34" 4.6" 34" 3.6" 34" 5" 34" 1 1/2" EIFS 5/8" GYP BD SPRINKLER & METER 6" METAL STUDS 105 94 SF T.O. WINDOWS 112' - 0" CAVITY INSULATION CITY STAMP AREA TENANT 1 TENANT 2 TENANT 4 TENANT 3 101 102 104 103 2415 SF 2374 SF 2577 SF PATH OF 1761 SF TRAVEL 27'-8" PATH OF PATH OF TRAVEL 37'-6" TRAVEL 7455 VILLAGE DRIVE, SUITE #110 PATH OF LINO LAKES, MN 55014 32'-2" TRAVEL 763 -553 -7927 29'-6" WWW.TANDGARCH.COM 1 1/2" RIDGED INSULATION T.O SILL 16505 75TH AVENUE NORTH 102' - 5" MAPLE GROVE, MN 55311 763 -234 -8108 STONE 24 24 18 25 FINISHEDfinish FLOOR floor 1 5" 34" 4.8" 34" 4.8" 34" 3.6" 34" 100' - 0" LIFE SAFETY PLAN (AREA PLAN) WALL SECTION 3 2 3/32" = 1'-0" 3/8" = 1'-0" ROGERS, MN A580 4 ELM CREEK CENTER ISSUE DATE CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN 02/18/26 CONCEPTUAL PLAN & ELEVATIONS 03/11/26 PERMIT & BID SET TBD SPRINKLER/METER 15' - 0 1/2" ROOM ? TBD 105 ? TBD 94 SF 45' - 11 5/16" 44' - 9" 34' - 11 5/16" 48' - 10 3/4" 6' - 10" TENANT 1 1 A580 PRELIMINARY 101 TENANT 4 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 2415 SF TENANT 2 49' - 11 5/8" 53' - 5 3/8" 104 102 TENANT 3 2577 SF 2374 SF 103 1761 SF A580 2 REVISION SCHEDULE NO. DESCRIPTION DATE CONCEPTUAL FLOOR PLAN 3 A580 Project Number 498 Date 03/19/2026 CONCEPTURAL FLOOR PLAN 1 1/8" = 1'-0" Drawn By ? Checked By ? EX02 Scale As indicated 4/27/2026 10:19:12 AM Page 66 of 131 EXTERIOR MATERIALS GENERAL EXT ELEV NOTES 1. GENERAL EXTERIOR ELEVATION NOTES T.O. PIER 1 EIFS -1 122' - 0" T.O. PIER ROOF SYSTEM W. INSUL PRECAST SILL ACCENT CULTURED STONE 120' - 8" BRICK EIFS DARK GRAY EPDM -1 PRC -1 VENEER BR -1 EIFS -1 MANUF TBD MANUF: CUSTOM STN -1 ACCENT BRICK T.O. LOW MANUF: TBD MANUF: TBD COLOR: BLACK COLOR: ACCENT MANUF: TBD PARAPET COLOR: TBD COLOR: CUSTOM 119' - 5" COLOR: TBD BR -1 T.O. WINDOWS 112' - 0" CITY STAMP AREA GLAZING METAL CANOPY PRC -1 STN -1 T.O SILL 102' - 5" ALUM W/ GLAZING 7455 VILLAGE DRIVE, SUITE #110 COPING/FLASHING EXTERIOR HM PAINT ALUM -B / GLZ -1 LINO LAKES, MN 55014 MTL -1 PT -1 3' - 0" 2' - 5" FINISHEDfinish FLOOR floor 1 MANUF: TBD 763 -553 -7927 MANUF: TBD MANUF: SHERWIN COLOR: ANNODIZED BLACK WWW.TANDGARCH.COM 100' - 0" COLOR: MATTE BLACK WILLIAMS COLOR: TRICORN BLACK ELEVATION - NORTH 1 1/8" = 1'-0" 16505 75TH AVENUE NORTH MAPLE GROVE, MN 55311 T.O. PIER 1 763 -234 -8108 122' - 0" ACCENT BRICK BR -1 EIFS -1 ACCENT BRICK BR -1 T.O. PIER 120' - 8" T.O. LOW PARAPET 119' - 5" T.O. WINDOWS 112' - 0" PRC -1 T.O SILL 102' - 5" 3' - 0" 2' - 5" 3' - 0" 2' - 5" finishFINISHED floor 1 FLOOR 100' - 0" 100' - 0" STOREFRONT STOREFRONT ALUM SUN SHADE STN -1 ALUM SUN SHADE ALUM SUN SHADE STN -1 ALUM SUN SHADE ROGERS, MN GLAZING GLAZING ELEVATION - EAST 3 1/8" = 1'-0" ELM CREEK CENTER T.O. PIER 1 EIFS -1 BR -1 ACCENT BRICK 122' - 0" ISSUE DATE T.O. PIER CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN 02/18/26 120' - 8" T.O. LOW CONCEPTUAL PLAN & ELEVATIONS 03/11/26 PARAPET PERMIT & BID SET TBD 119' - 5" ? TBD ? TBD T.O. WINDOWS 112' - 0" METAL CANOPY PRC -1 GLAZING T.O SILL 102' - 5" PRELIMINARY 3' - 0" 2' - 5" FINISHED FLOOR NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 100' - 0" DRIVE-THRU WINDOW STN -1 REVISION SCHEDULE ELEVATION - SOUTH NO. DESCRIPTION DATE 2 1/8" = 1'-0" T.O. PIER EIFS -1 BR -1 120' - 8" T.O. LOW PARAPET 119' - 5" CONCEPTUALEXTERIOR ELEVATIONSELEVATIONS Project Number 498 Date 03/19/2026 T.O SILL 102' - 5" Drawn By - Checked By KMT 3' - 0" 2' - 5" FINISHED FLOOR 100' - 0" STN -1 EX03A580 ELEVATION - WEST 4 1/8" = 1'-0" Scale As indicated 4/27/2026 10:20:41 AM Page 67 of 131 CITY STAMP AREA 7455 VILLAGE DRIVE, SUITE #110 LINO LAKES, MN 55014 763 -553 -7927 WWW.TANDGARCH.COM 16505 75TH AVENUE NORTH MAPLE GROVE, MN 55311 763 -234 -8108 ROGERS, MN ELM CREEK CENTER ISSUE DATE CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN 02/18/26 CONCEPTUAL PLAN & ELEVATIONS 03/11/26 PERMIT & BID SET TBD ? TBD ? TBD PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION REVISION SCHEDULE NO. DESCRIPTION DATE CONCEPTUAL RENDERINGS Project Number 498 Date 03/19/2026 Drawn By ? Checked By ? EX04 Scale 12" = 1'-0" 4/27/2026 10:19:12 AM Page 68 of 131 CITY STAMP AREA 7455 VILLAGE DRIVE, SUITE #110 LINO LAKES, MN 55014 763 -553 -7927 WWW.TANDGARCH.COM 16505 75TH AVENUE NORTH MAPLE GROVE, MN 55311 763 -234 -8108 ROGERS, MN ELM CREEK CENTER ISSUE DATE CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN 02/18/26 CONCEPTUAL PLAN & ELEVATIONS 03/11/26 PERMIT & BID SET TBD ? TBD ? TBD PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION REVISION SCHEDULE NO. DESCRIPTION DATE CONCEPTUAL RENDERINGS Project Number 498 Date 03/19/2026 Drawn By ? Checked By ? EX05 Scale 12" = 1'-0" 4/27/2026 10:19:12 AM Page 69 of 131 THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION DEPICTED IN THESE PLANS ARE SHOWN ACCORDING TO CI/ASCE 38-02, "STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA," LEVEL D STANDARDS. LEGEND NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Page 70 of 131NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Page 71 of 131NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Page 72 of 131 939.5 Main Street Frontage938.1 Road 940.2 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION B i t u m i n o u s 8" PVC 941.0 End of concrete curb 938.8 940.2 941.8 (n) inv = 926.64 tcc942.6 (se) inv = 926.62 tcc 942.79 tcc 939.5 S 937.52 943.23 Sanitary Manhole rim=939.70 tcc C 940.7 N 89°16'32" E 164.56 938.8 937.49 943.2 cped 941.0 tcc Utility Easement 943.15 Drainage & S 72°20'27" W 83.87 10 14" maple 23.29 937.7 tcc Outlot B941.6 Walter Dehn Commerce Center 5th 937.12 tcc 10 tcc 937.60 942.99 84.33 (Walter Dehn Commerce Center 5th) concrete curb tcc N 89°57'01" W tcc 937.01 10 937.04 83.88 (Diamond Lake Village) 11" pine Rogers Drive 939.7 936.3 Utility Easement 13" pine 939.1 Drainage & 940.0 tcc concrete curb 941.6 936.85 15" cherry 942 937.8 943.1 943.2 Light Pole tcc 941 942.51 15" cherry P o s s i b l e B o u n d a r y 938.1 943 940 5 tcc 936.30 tcc 941.94 938.4 936.8 tcc 941.79 939.9 Light Pole 942.8 934.9 944.74 top nut hydrant 941.2 942.6 S 00°43'28" E 349.05 941.3 N 00°43'28" W 349.06 941.2 941.2 determined tcc 10 941.45 Estate to be Additional325.76 Real 10" pine 936.5 936.4 tcc 937.1 935.53 938.7 942 10" pine 936.1 tcc 8' in PVC 941.14 (w) inv = 926.718" DIP (n) inv = 926.64 941.9 100.0 Sanitary Manhole Water Service rim=940.97 941.8 8" PVC S 12" pine tcc 941.5 935.8 940.80 (w) inv = 929.09 Light (n) inv = 929.09 Pole Storm Manhole (w) inv941 = 928.94 rim=940.59 (e) inv = 928.87 tcc 933.7 D D 935.5 934.73 936.1 Storm Manhole 941.0 937.6 rim=940.54 16" maple 941.2 935.7 10 5 8" PVC tcc 939.86 8" PVC 937.9 936.0 934.9 tcc 934.17 10" DIP 940.9 939 940.2 938 937 11" cherry 933 932.2 940 934.8 P o s s i b l e B o u n d a r y 936 13" cherry Rogers Drive 934.3 Light Pole tcc 933.31 tcc 938.74 937.9 933.8 938.8 935.8 935.0 5 P a r k i n g L o t 935 13" pine 931.2 933.9 concrete932 curb Sign 10 tcc 11" pine 937.95concrete curb 933.7 934 8" in PVC (e) inv = 927.91 (s) inv = 928.01 tcc tcc 937.1 932.58 931.83 tcc Sanitary Manhole Light cpedC 10 937.56 10 rim=934.07 S Pole T 935.9 934.8 933.5 937.2 tped N 89°16'32" E 164.11 tcc Sign Sign 936.85 tcc tcc tcc tcc tcc tcc 933.14 (n) inv935.64 = 913.17 935.00 934.43 933.92 936.25 (e) inv = 913.19 (w) inv = 913.19 136th Ave Sanitary Manhole S rim=936.04 S D 830 LEGEND Page 73 of 131 █ Main Street █ Frontage Road █ █ █ █ R5.5 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION B i t u m i n o u s█ █ █ R5.0 8" PVC █ End of concrete curb █ █ (n) inv = 926.64 24.0 █ (se) inv = 926.62 █ Sanitary ManholeS █ rim=939.70 C █N 89°16'32" E 164.56 938.8 cped █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ 10.1 11.7 █ █ 14" maple 937.7 █ 5.0 █ █ (TYP.)18.0 █ concrete curb █ █ (TYP.) 11" pine █ Rogers Drive 9.0 █ 939.7 █ BW=937.6 █ TW=937.9 █ 26.1 13" pine █ 939.1 █ █ concrete curb█ █ 15" cherry BW=936.8 █ 937.8 TW=938.3 (TYP.) █ █ Light 9.0 Pole ►► █ █ 15" cherry P o s s i b l e B o u n d a r y 938.1 █ █ █ █ 12.0 █ ►► █ █ (TYP.) █ 18.0 █ █ █ (PER ARCHITECTURAL PLANS) ►► █ ►► PROPOSED BUILDING █ (TYP.) 9.0 FFE = 938.5 █ █ BW=936.3TW=937.6 Light Pole (TYP.) █ █ 9.0 944.74 top nut hydrant █N 00°43'28" W 349.06 █ ►► ►► (TYP.) █ █ 18.0 █ 10" pine █ █ 936.5 ►► █ ►► █ (PER ARCHITECTURAL PLANS) █ PROPOSED BUILDING █ 10" pine █ FFE = 938.5 8' in PVC █ 936.1 (w) inv = 926.718" DIP █ (n) inv = 926.64 ►► BW=935.2TW=938.2 26.0 █ 100.0 Sanitary Manhole█ Water Service rim=940.97 941.8 ►► █ S 8" PVC █ ▌ 12" pine █ 935.8 █ ►► █ (w) inv = 929.09 Light (n) inv = 929.09 █ █ Pole Storm Manhole (w) inv = 928.94 ▌ (PER ARCHITECTURAL PLANS) ►► rim=940.59 █ (e) inv = 928.87 D D PROPOSED BUILDING █ █ Storm Manhole FFE = 938.5 rim=940.54 █ 16" maple 935.7 █ ▌ █ █ ►► ►► █ █ █ 21.5 █ ▌ BW=934.3 9.0 8" PVC TW=937.6 (TYP.) █ █ ►► ▌ ►► █ 8" PVC █ (PER ARCHITECTURAL PLANS) (TYP.) PROPOSED BUILDING █ 10" DIP █ 18.0 ▌ █ FFE = 938.5 █ █ █ ▌ ►► ►► 11" cherry BW=934.1TW=936.4 934.8 █ P o s s i b l e B o u n d a r y █ █ ▌ █ 13" cherry █ █ 934.3 ►► ▌ ►► Rogers Drive█ █ Light █ █ Pole ▌ █ 19.1 (TYP.)18.0 █ █ ▌ ►► (TYP.) █ ►► █ 9.0 █ █ BW=934.0TW=934.0P a r k i n g L o t ▌ █ ▌ ▌ █ ▌ ▌ 26.0 ▌ █ 13" pine ►► ►► █ 5.1 933.9 █ concrete curb Sign █ █ (TYP.) ▌ 11" pine concrete curb █ 933.7 9.0 █ (TYP.)18.0 26.0 ►► ►► █ 8" in PVC█ (e) inv = 927.91 █ (s) inv = 928.01 ►► ►► ►► ►► ►► █ Sanitary Manhole Light cpedC █ 10.0 S Pole T rim=934.07 █ 937.2 R5.0 tped █ N 89°16'32"R5.0 E 164.11 █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ Sign Sign █ █ █ █ █ █ █ (n) inv = 913.17 (e) inv = 913.19 (w) inv = 913.19 136th Ave Sanitary Manhole S rim=936.04 Site Plan ►► LEGEND SITE DATA: Page 74 of 131 █ Main Street █ Frontage Road █ █ █ █ B i t u m i n o u s█ █ 941 939█ 8" PVC █ End of concrete curb █ █ (n) inv = 926.64 tcc █ (se) inv = 926.62 tcc 942.79 tcc S 937.52 █ Sanitary Manhole 943.23 █ rim=939.70 tcc C █N 89°16'32" E 164.56 938.8 937.49 cped █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ tcc 943.15 941 █ █ 14" maple 937.7 tcc █ 940 █ 937.12 tcc tcc 937.60 942.99 █ █ concrete curb tcc tcc 937.01 939 █ █ 937.04 11" pine █ Rogers Drive █ 939.7 █ █ █ 939 13" pine █ 939.1 █ 938 █ tcc concrete curb█ 936.85 █ 15" cherry █ 937.8 █ █ Light Pole tcc ►► █ 942.51█ 15" cherry P o s s i b l e B o u n d a r y 938.1 █ █ 938 █ █ █ ►► █ █ █ 938 938 █ 942 █ (PER ARCHITECTURAL PLANS) tcc █ 941 936.30 ►► █ tcc ►► PROPOSED BUILDING 941.94 █ 940 tcc FFE = 938.5 █ 941.79 █ Light Pole 939 █ █ 944.74 top nut hydrant 938 █N 00°43'28" W 349.06 █ ►► ►► 938 █ █ tcc 941.45 █ 10" pine 938937 █ █ 936.5 ►► tcc █ ►► █ (PER ARCHITECTURAL PLANS) 935.53 █ PROPOSED BUILDING █ 10" pine █ FFE = 938.5 936.1 tcc 8' in PVC █ (w) inv = 926.718" DIP 941.14 █ (n) inv = 926.64 ►► 938 █ 100.0 Sanitary Manhole█ Water Service rim=940.97 941.8 ►► █ S █ 8" PVC ▌ █ 12" pine tcc 935.8 940.80 █ ►► █ (w) inv = 929.09 Light (n) inv = 929.09 █ █ Pole Storm Manhole (w) inv = 928.94 ▌ (PER ARCHITECTURAL PLANS) ►► rim=940.59 █ (e) inv = 928.87 tcc D D PROPOSED BUILDING █ 934.73 █ Storm Manhole FFE = 938.5 rim=940.54 █ 16" maple 935.7 █ ▌ █ █ ►► ►► █ █ █ █ ▌ 8" PVC █ █ tcc 939.86 ►► ▌ ►► █ 8" PVC █ (PER ARCHITECTURAL PLANS) tcc 934.17 █ PROPOSED BUILDING █ 10" DIP 938 ▌ █ FFE = 938.5 █ █ █ ▌ ►► ►► 11" cherry 934.8 █ P o s s i b l e B o u n d a r y █ 938 █ ▌ █ 939 13" cherry █ █ 934.3 ►► ▌ ►► Rogers Drive█ 938 █ █ 938 Light █ Pole tcc ▌ 933.31 █ █ tcc 938.74 █ ►► ▌ █ ►► █ █ P a r k i n g L o t █ 938 ▌ 937 █ ▌ █ ▌ ▌ ▌ 937 ▌ █ ►► 937 13" pine █ ►► 933.9 █ concrete curb Sign █ tcc 937 █ ▌ 11" pine 937.95concrete curb █ 933.7 █ 936 ►► ►► █ 8" in PVC█ (e) inv = 927.91 █ (s) inv934 = 928.01 tcc tcc ►► ►► ►► ►► ►► █ 932.58 931.83 tcc 935 Sanitary Manhole Light 937.56 cpedC █ S Pole T rim=934.07 █ 937.2 tped █ N 89°16'32" E 164.11935 █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ 935 █ tcc Sign Sign █ 936.85 tcc █ █tcc █ █ █ █ tcc tcc tcc tcc 933.14 (n) inv935.64 = 913.17 935.00 934.43 933.92 936.25 (e) inv = 913.19 (w) inv = 913.19 136th Ave Sanitary Manhole S rim=936.04 LEGEND ►► 830 830 Page 75 of 131 █ Main Street █ Frontage Road █ █ █ █ B i t u m i n o u s█ █ █ 8" PVC █ End of concrete curb █ █ (n) inv = 926.64 █ (se) inv = 926.62 █ Sanitary ManholeS █ rim=939.70 C █ 938.8 cped █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ 14" maple 937.7 █ █ █ █ concrete curb █ █ 11" pine █ Rogers Drive █ 939.7 █ █ █ 13" pine █ 939.1 █ █ concrete curb█ █ 15" cherry █ 937.8 █ █ Light Pole ►► █ █ 15" cherry P o s s i b l e B o u n d a r y 938.1 █ █ █ █ █ ►► █ █ █ █ █ █ (PER ARCHITECTURAL PLANS) ►► █ ►► PROPOSED BUILDING █ FFE = 938.5 █ █ Light Pole █ █ top nut hydrant 944.74 █ █ ►► ►► █ █ █ 10" pine █ █ 936.5 ►► █ ►► █ (PER ARCHITECTURAL PLANS) █ PROPOSED BUILDING █ 10" pine █ FFE = 938.5 8' in PVC █ 936.1 (w) inv = 926.718" DIP 1 █ (n) inv = 926.64 ►► █ 100.0 Sanitary Manhole█ Water Service rim=940.97 941.8 ►► █ S 8" PVC █ ▌ 12" pine █ 935.8 █ ►► █ █ Light █ Pole Storm Manhole (w) inv = 928.94 ▌ (PER ARCHITECTURAL PLANS) ►► rim=940.59 █ (e) inv = 928.87 D D PROPOSED BUILDING █ █ Storm Manhole FFE = 938.5 rim=940.54 █ 16" maple 935.7 █ ▌ 1 █ █ ►► ►► █ █ 1 █ █ 1 ▌ 8" PVC █ █ ►► ▌ ►► █ 8" PVC █ (PER ARCHITECTURAL PLANS) █ 10" DIP █ PROPOSED BUILDING ▌ █ FFE = 938.5 █ █ █ ▌ ►► ►► 11" cherry 934.8 █ P o s s i b l e B o u n d a r y █ █ ▌ █ 13" cherry █ █ 934.3 ►► ▌ ►► Rogers Drive█ █ Light █ 2 █ Pole ▌ █ █ █ ►► ▌ █ ►► █ 2 1 █ █ P a r k i n g L o t ▌ █ ▌ ▌ ▌1 █ 1 ▌ ▌ ►► █ 13" pine █ ►► 933.9 █ concrete curb Sign █ █ ▌ 11" pine concrete curb █ 933.7 █ ►► ►► █ 8" in PVC█ (e) inv = 927.91 █ (s) inv = 928.01 ►► ►► ►► ►► ►► █ Sanitary Manhole Light cpedC █ S Pole T rim=934.07 █ 937.2 tped █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ Sign Sign █ █ █ █ █ █ █ (n) inv = 913.17 (e) inv = 913.19 (w) inv = 913.19 136th Ave Sanitary Manhole S rim=936.04 ►► S D ►► LEGEND Page 76 of 131 █ Main Street █ Frontage Road █ █ █ █ B i t u m i n o u s█ █ 941 939█ 8" PVC █ End of concrete curb █ █ (n) inv = 926.64 █ (se) inv = 926.62 █ Sanitary ManholeS █ rim=939.70 C █N 89°16'32" E 164.56 938.8 cped █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ 941 █ █ 14" maple 937.7 █ 940 █ █ █ concrete curb 939 █ █ 11" pine █ Rogers Drive █ 939.7 █ █ █ 939 13" pine █ 939.1 █ 938 █ concrete curb█ █ 15" cherry █ 942 937.8 █ █ Light Pole ►► 941 █ █ 15" cherry P o s s i b l e B o u n d a r y 938.1 █ █ 938 █ █ █ 943 █ ►► 940 █ █ 938 938 █ 942 █ (PER ARCHITECTURAL PLANS) █ 941 ►► █ ►► PROPOSED BUILDING █ 940 FFE = 938.5 █ █ Light Pole 939 █ █ 944.74 top nut hydrant 938 █N 00°43'28" W 349.06 █ ►► ►► 938 █ █ █ 10" pine 938937 █ █ 936.5 ►► █ ►► █ (PER ARCHITECTURAL PLANS) █ PROPOSED BUILDING █ 942 10" pine █ FFE = 938.5 8' in PVC █ 936.1 (w) inv = 926.718" DIP █ (n) inv = 926.64 ►► 938 █ 100.0 Sanitary Manhole█ Water Service rim=940.97 941.8 ►► █ S 8" PVC █ ▌ 12" pine █ 935.8 █ ►► █ (w) inv = 929.09 Light (n) inv = 929.09 █ █ Pole Storm Manhole (w) inv = 928.94 ▌ (PER ARCHITECTURAL PLANS) ►► rim=940.59 █ (e) inv941 = 928.87 D D PROPOSED BUILDING █ █ Storm Manhole FFE = 938.5 rim=940.54 █ 16" maple 935.7 █ ▌ █ █ ►► ►► █ █ █ █ ▌ 8" PVC █ █ ►► ▌ ►► █ 8" PVC █ (PER ARCHITECTURAL PLANS) █ PROPOSED BUILDING █ 10" DIP 938 ▌ 939 █ FFE = 938.5 █ 938 █ █ ▌ ►► ►► 937 11" cherry 933 940 934.8 █ P o s s i b l e B o u n d a r y █ 938 █ ▌ █ 939 936 13" cherry █ █ 934.3 ►► ▌ ►► Rogers Drive█ 938 █ 938 Light █ █ Pole ▌ █ █ █ ►► ▌ █ ►► █ █ P a r k i n g L o t █ 938 ▌ 937 █ ▌ █ ▌ ▌ ▌ 935 937 ▌ █ ►► 937 13" pine █ ►► 933.9 █ concrete932 curb Sign █ 937 █ ▌ 11" pine concrete curb █ 933.7 █ 936 ►► ►► 934 █ 8" in PVC█ (e) inv = 927.91 █ (s) inv934 = 928.01 ►► ►► ►► ►► ►► █ 935 Sanitary Manhole Light cpedC █ S Pole T rim=934.07 █ 937.2 tped █ N 89°16'32" E 164.11935 █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ 935 █ Sign Sign █ █ █ █ █ █ █ (n) inv = 913.17 (e) inv = 913.19 (w) inv = 913.19 136th Ave Sanitary Manhole S rim=936.04 █ ►► █ █ LEGEND █ Page 77 of 131SWPPP DESIGNER: · · · Page 78 of 131 939.5 █ Main Street █ Frontage Road █ █ █ █ 940.2 B i t u m i n o u s█ █ █ 8" PVC 941.0 █ End of concrete curb █ 941.8 █ (n) inv = 926.64 942.6 █ (se) inv = 926.62 █ Sanitary ManholeS █ rim=939.70 C █N 89°16'32" E 164.56 938.8 cped █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ 14" maple 23.29 937.7 █ █ █ █ concrete curb █ █ 11" pine █ Rogers Drive █ 939.7 █ █ █ 13" pine █ 939.1 █ █ concrete curb█ █ 15" cherry █ 937.8 █ █ Light Pole ►► █ █ 15" cherry P o s s i b l e B o u n d a r y 938.1 █ █ █ █ █ ►► █ █ █ █ █ █ (PER ARCHITECTURAL PLANS) ►► █ ►► PROPOSED BUILDING █ FFE = 938.5 █ █ Light Pole █ █ 941.2 944.74 top nut hydrant █N 00°43'28" W 349.06 941.3 █ ►► 941.2 ►► █ 941.2 █ █ 10" pine █ █ 936.5 ►► █ ►► █ (PER ARCHITECTURAL PLANS) █ PROPOSED BUILDING █ 10" pine █ FFE = 938.5 8' in PVC █ 936.1 (w) inv = 926.718" DIP █ (n) inv = 926.64 ►► █ 100.0 Sanitary Manhole█ Water Service rim=940.97 941.8 ►► █ S 8" PVC █ ▌ 12" pine █ 935.8 █ ►► █ (w) inv = 929.09 Light (n) inv = 929.09 █ █ Pole Storm Manhole (w) inv = 928.94 ▌ (PER ARCHITECTURAL PLANS) ►► rim=940.59 █ (e) inv = 928.87 D D PROPOSED BUILDING █ █ Storm Manhole FFE = 938.5 rim=940.54 █ 16" maple 935.7 █ ▌ █ █ ►► ►► █ █ █ █ ▌ 8" PVC █ █ ►► ▌ ►► █ 8" PVC █ (PER ARCHITECTURAL PLANS) █ 10" DIP █ PROPOSED BUILDING ▌ █ FFE = 938.5 █ █ █ ▌ ►► ►► 11" cherry 934.8 █ P o s s i b l e B o u n d a r y █ █ ▌ █ 13" cherry █ █ 934.3 ►► ▌ ►► Rogers Drive█ █ Light █ █ Pole ▌ █ █ █ ►► ▌ █ ►► █ █ █ P a r k i n g L o t ▌ █ ▌ █ ▌ ▌ ▌ ▌ ►► █ 13" pine █ ►► 933.9 █ concrete curb Sign █ █ ▌ 11" pine concrete curb █ 933.7 █ ►► ►► █ 8" in PVC█ (e) inv = 927.91 █ (s) inv = 928.01 ►► ►► ►► ►► ►► █ Sanitary Manhole Light cpedC █ S Pole T rim=934.07 █ 937.2 tped █ N 89°16'32" E 164.11 █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ Sign Sign █ █ █ █ █ █ █ (n) inv = 913.17 (e) inv = 913.19 (w) inv = 913.19 136th Ave Sanitary Manhole S rim=936.04 Pumper Fire Truck Page 79 of 131 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN Elm Creek Center 21355 136th Avenue N Rogers, Minnesota March 27, 2026 Revised – April 24, 2026 Prepared By: Prepared For: Demarc Land Surveying & Engineering Thielen & Green 7601 73rd Avenue North 7455 Village Drive, Suite #110 Brooklyn Park, Minnesota 55428 Lino Lakes, MN 55014 763.560.3093 I hereby certify that this Plan, Specification or Report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. 52706 03.27.26 Jeffrey A Prasch, PE License Number Date Project Engineer Page 80 of 131 Stormwater Management Plan Elm Creek Center – Rogers, MN Revised – April 24, 2026 Table of Contents Table of Contents ..................................................................................................................................... i 1.0 Project Overview .......................................................................................................................... ii 2.0 Design Considerations ................................................................................................................ ii 3.0 Rate, Volume, and Water Quality Control .................................................................................. ii Table 3.1 – Discharge Rate Summary ............................................................................... ii 4.0 Storm Sewer Design .................................................................................................................... ii Appendix A – Figures Figure 1 – Drainage Areas Existing Conditions Figure 2 – Drainage Areas Proposed Conditions Figure 3 – Precipitation Data Figure 4 – Rational Method Appendix B – Existing Conditions 2-Year Summary……………......…...………................……........1-6 Appendix C – Existing Conditions 10-Year Summary…………........…...……...............……….........7-9 Appendix D – Existing Conditions 100-Year Summary……………........…..…...............………….10-18 Appendix E – Proposed Conditions 2-Year Summary…………………………...…...…....…...….......1-5 Appendix F – Proposed Conditions 10-Year Summary……………………...…....................…..........6-7 Appendix G – Proposed Conditions 100-Year Summary………………………......…...…...…..........8-14 Appendix H – Soils Summary……………………...……….……………………...……….…...….……….1-5 i Page 81 of 131 Stormwater Management Plan Elm Creek Center – Rogers, MN Revised – April 24, 2026 1.0 Project Overview A building and associated parking lot is proposed at 21335 136th Avenue North in Rogers, MN. The approximate 1.5-acre site is currently vacant that consists of open space and few trees. There are commercial buildings to the west and Main Street Frontage Road to the south, 136th Avenue N to the north, and Rogers Dr to the east. Currently most of the stormwater runoff is directed via surface flow to the west. The remaining of the stormwater runoff flows to the streets to the south, east, and north. The existing drainage conditions are shown in Figure 1. The proposed improvements will include a building and parking lot with a proposed land disturbance of 1.57 acres. Regional ponding has been provided to treat the stormwater and meet rate, volume, and water quality requirements. Therefore, no on-site stormwater facilities will be required. Majority of the site will be routed via surface flow and storm sewer to the existing storm sewer that will discharge to off-site regional ponding. The remaining stormwater runoff will continue to run off to the north and west. Figure 2 shows the proposed drainage conditions. 2.0 Design Considerations The City of Rogers (City) and the Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission (ECWMC) dictate the rate, volume, and water quality requirements for this site. There is off-site regional ponding that was sized to meet the rate, volume, and water quality requirements for the existing stub and storm sewer on the site. The on-site storm water system is based on their guidelines. The following design tools, methods, and considerations were used in the design of the on-site stormwater system: Rate and Volume Modeling Software – HydroCAD 10.20 Rainfall Distribution – MSE 24-hour Type III Rainfall Data – NOAA Atlas 14 rainfall data as shown in Figure 3. Soil Conditions – Hydrologic Soil Group C based on Web Soil Survey shown in Appendix H. Infiltration Rate = 0.20 in/hr 3.0 Rate, Volume, and Water Quality Control The existing regional pond has been designed to account for the development of this site per the City of Rogers and ECWMC. Table 3.1 summarizes the discharge rates for each storm event. Table 3.1 – Discharge Rate Summary Discharge Rate [cfs] Discharge Node Storm Event 2-Year 10-Year 100-Year Pre- Post- Pre- Post- Pre- Post- Total Offsite (6L) 2.06 5.25 4.64 8.15 10.67 14.19 The HydroCAD results for the rate control are included in Appendices B-G. 4.0 Storm Sewer Design The storm sewers were designed to convey the 10-year storm event peak discharge. The Rational Method Storm Sewer Calculations are shown in Figure 4. ii Page 82 of 131 Appendix A Figures Page 83 of 131 4L 939.5 Main Street Frontage Road B i t u m i n o u 940.2s 8" PVC End of concrete curb 941.0 (n) inv = 926.64 (se) inv = 926.62 942.6 941.8 S Sanitary Manhole C N 89°16'32" E 164.56rim=939.70 938.8 cped Utility Easement Drainage & S 72°20'27" W 83.87 10 14" maple 23.29 4S 937.7 10 84.33 (Walter Dehn Commerce Center 5th) concrete curb N 89°57'01" W 10 83.88 (Diamond Lake Village) 11" pine Rogers Drive 939.7 Utility Easement 13" pine Drainage & 939.1 concrete curb 942 15" cherry 937.8 941 Light 15" cherryPole P o s s i b l e B o u n d a r y 938.1 943 940 5 Light Pole top nut hydrant 941.2 944.74 S 00°43'28" E 349.05 N 00°43'28" W 349.06 941.2941.3 3L 941.2 10 325.76 10" pine 3S 936.5 942 1S 10" pine 8' in PVC (w) inv = 926.71 936.1 (n) inv = 926.648" DIP 100.0 Sanitary Manhole Water Service rim=940.97S 941.88" PVC 12" pine 935.8 (w) inv = 929.09 (n) inv = 929.09 Light (w) inv = 928.94 Storm Manhole (e) inv941 = 928.87 Pole rim=940.59D D Storm Manhole 16" maple rim=940.54 935.7 10 5 8" PVC 8" PVC 10" DIP 939 1L 938 937 933 940 11" cherry P o s s i b l e B o u n d a r y 934.8 936 13" cherry Rogers Drive 934.3 Light Pole 935 5 P a r k i n g L o t 13" pine 2S 933.9 932 concrete curb 10 Sign 11" pine concrete curb 934933.7 8" in PVC (e) inv = 927.91 (s) inv = 928.01 C cpedT 10 Sanitary10 ManholeS Light rim=934.07 Pole tped937.2 N 89°16'32" E 164.11 Sign Sign (n) inv = 913.17 (e) inv = 913.19 (w) inv = 913.19 136th Ave SanitaryS Manhole 2L rim=936.04 1R 1L 1P 1S DRAINAGEREACH ARROWLINK NUMBER NUMBERPOND/CATCHSUBCATCHMENTLEGEND BASIN NUMBER NUMBER Page 84 of 131 ELM CREEK CENTER 21355 136TH AVENUE N ROGERS, MN 939.5 █ Main Street█ Frontage█ Road B i t u m i█ n o u 940.2s 941 939 █8" PVC End of concrete curb 941.0 █ (n) inv = 926.64 (se) inv = 926.62 942.6 941.8 █ S Sanitary Manhole C █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █N 89°16'32" E 164.56rim=939.70█ 938.8 cped █ 941 14" maple 23.29 █ 940 █ 937.7 concrete curb █ 939 █11" pine Rogers Drive 939.7 █ 939 █13" pine █ 938 939.1 █ concrete curb 942 15" cherry █ 937.8 941 █ Light █ 15" cherryPole P o s s i b l e B o u n d a r y 938.1█ █ 938 943 ►► 940 █ █942 938 938 941 █ █ (PER ARCHITECTURAL PLANS) 940 PROPOSED BUILDING FFE = 938.5 █ 939 Light █ Pole top nut 938hydrant 941.2 944.74 ►► 938 ►► N█ 00°43'28" W 349.06 941.3 █ 941.2941.2 93893710"█ pine 936.5 █ (PER ARCHITECTURAL PLANS) █ PROPOSED BUILDING 942 FFE = 938.5 10" pine █ 8' in PVC █ (w) inv = 926.71 ►► 936.1 (n) inv = 926.648" DIP 100.0 938 Sanitary Manhole█ Water Service █ rim=940.97S 941.88" PVC 3S 12" pine ►► 935.8 █ ▌ (w) inv = 929.09 █ (n) inv = 929.09 Light (w) inv = 928.94 Storm Manhole (e) inv941 = 928.87 (PER ARCHITECTURAL PLANS) Pole D █ rim=940.59 D PROPOSED BUILDING █ 3L Storm Manhole FFE = 938.5 16" maple rim=940.54█ █935.7 ▌ █ ►► █ 8" PVC █ 8" PVC ►► (PER ARCHITECTURAL PLANS) █ 938 PROPOSED BUILDING 10" DIP █ 939 ▌ 938 FFE = 938.5 █ 937 933 █ 940 ▌ 11" cherry █ P938 o s s i b l e B o u n d a r y ►► 934.8 █939 936 █13" cherry 938 934.3 Rogers Drive█ ►► 938 Light ▌ █ █ Pole ▌ █ █ 938 P a r k i n g L o t 937 935 █ ▌ ▌ █ 937 ►►2S 13" pine 1L ►► 937 933.9 932 ▌ █ concrete curb █ 937 Sign 11" pine concrete curb 936 1S934█933.7 8" in934 PVC █ (e) inv = 927.91 ►► ►► 935 (s) inv = 928.01█ C cpedT Sanitary ManholeS Light █ 935rim=934.07 Pole tped937.2 N 89°16'32" E 164.11 █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ 935 Sign Sign █ █ █ (n) inv = 913.17 (e) inv = 913.19 (w) inv = 913.19 136th Ave SanitaryS Manhole 2L rim=936.04 1R 1L 1P 1S DRAINAGEREACH ARROWLINK NUMBER NUMBERPOND/CATCHSUBCATCHMENTLEGEND BASIN NUMBER NUMBER Page 85 of 131 ELM CREEK CENTER 21355 136TH AVENUE N ROGERS, MN NOAA Atlas 14, Volume 8, Version 2 Location name: Rogers, Minnesota, USA* Latitude: 45.2017°, Longitude: -93.5509° Elevation: 937 ft** * source: ESRI Maps ** source: USGS POINT PRECIPITATION FREQUENCY ESTIMATES Sanja Perica, Deborah Martin, Sandra Pavlovic, Ishani Roy, Michael St. Laurent, Carl Trypaluk, Dale Unruh, Michael Yekta, Geoffery Bonnin NOAA, National Weather Service, Silver Spring, Maryland PF_tabular | PF_graphical | Maps_&_aerials PF tabular PDS-based point precipitation frequency estimates with 90% confidence intervals (in inches)1 Average recurrence interval (years) Duration 1 2 5 10 25 50 100 200 500 1000 0.363 0.427 0.535 0.627 0.758 0.862 0.969 1.08 1.23 1.35 5-min (0.283‑0.468) (0.332‑0.551) (0.415‑0.691) (0.484‑0.813) (0.570‑1.00) (0.636‑1.15) (0.694‑1.31) (0.747‑1.48) (0.824‑1.72) (0.882‑1.90) 0.531 0.625 0.783 0.918 1.11 1.26 1.42 1.58 1.81 1.98 10-min (0.414‑0.686) (0.487‑0.807) (0.608‑1.01) (0.709‑1.19) (0.835‑1.47) (0.931‑1.68) (1.02‑1.92) (1.09‑2.17) (1.21‑2.52) (1.29‑2.78) 0.648 0.762 0.955 1.12 1.35 1.54 1.73 1.93 2.20 2.41 15-min (0.505‑0.836) (0.594‑0.985) (0.741‑1.24) (0.865‑1.45) (1.02‑1.80) (1.14‑2.05) (1.24‑2.34) (1.33‑2.65) (1.47‑3.07) (1.58‑3.39) 0.903 1.07 1.34 1.58 1.91 2.18 2.45 2.73 3.12 3.41 30-min (0.704‑1.17) (0.832‑1.38) (1.04‑1.74) (1.22‑2.05) (1.44‑2.54) (1.61‑2.91) (1.75‑3.31) (1.89‑3.75) (2.08‑4.34) (2.23‑4.80) 1.17 1.38 1.74 2.06 2.53 2.92 3.33 3.77 4.38 4.87 60-min (0.910‑1.51) (1.07‑1.78) (1.35‑2.25) (1.59‑2.67) (1.92‑3.38) (2.16‑3.92) (2.39‑4.53) (2.61‑5.20) (2.94‑6.13) (3.18‑6.84) 1.43 1.68 2.13 2.54 3.15 3.66 4.21 4.81 5.65 6.33 2-hr (1.13‑1.83) (1.32‑2.15) (1.67‑2.72) (1.98‑3.25) (2.41‑4.18) (2.74‑4.88) (3.06‑5.69) (3.36‑6.59) (3.82‑7.86) (4.16‑8.83) 1.59 1.86 2.37 2.83 3.55 4.17 4.84 5.57 6.62 7.48 3-hr (1.26‑2.02) (1.48‑2.37) (1.87‑3.01) (2.23‑3.61) (2.75‑4.71) (3.14‑5.54) (3.54‑6.52) (3.92‑7.62) (4.50‑9.19) (4.94‑10.4) 1.87 2.18 2.78 3.34 4.22 4.98 5.81 6.73 8.06 9.14 6-hr (1.50‑2.34) (1.75‑2.74) (2.22‑3.49) (2.65‑4.21) (3.30‑5.55) (3.80‑6.57) (4.30‑7.78) (4.79‑9.15) (5.53‑11.1) (6.09‑12.6) 2.14 2.51 3.20 3.84 4.82 5.66 6.58 7.58 9.02 10.2 12-hr (1.74‑2.66) (2.04‑3.12) (2.58‑3.97) (3.08‑4.78) (3.80‑6.26) (4.35‑7.38) (4.90‑8.70) (5.43‑10.2) (6.24‑12.3) (6.84‑14.0) 2.47 2.86 3.59 4.26 5.30 6.18 7.13 8.17 9.67 10.9 24-hr (2.02‑3.02) (2.34‑3.51) (2.93‑4.41) (3.46‑5.25) (4.22‑6.80) (4.80‑7.96) (5.36‑9.34) (5.91‑10.9) (6.74‑13.1) (7.36‑14.8) 2.88 3.26 3.97 4.64 5.68 6.58 7.57 8.66 10.2 11.5 2-day (2.39‑3.49) (2.70‑3.95) (3.27‑4.82) (3.80‑5.65) (4.58‑7.22) (5.17‑8.41) (5.75‑9.84) (6.33‑11.5) (7.20‑13.8) (7.86‑15.6) 3.15 3.54 4.26 4.94 6.00 6.92 7.92 9.02 10.6 11.9 3-day (2.63‑3.79) (2.95‑4.26) (3.54‑5.14) (4.08‑5.98) (4.87‑7.57) (5.46‑8.78) (6.05‑10.2) (6.62‑11.9) (7.49‑14.2) (8.16‑16.0) 3.36 3.78 4.54 5.25 6.34 7.28 8.29 9.39 11.0 12.3 4-day (2.82‑4.03) (3.16‑4.53) (3.79‑5.45) (4.36‑6.32) (5.16‑7.95) (5.76‑9.18) (6.35‑10.6) (6.92‑12.3) (7.78‑14.7) (8.44‑16.5) 3.88 4.40 5.31 6.13 7.34 8.34 9.40 10.5 12.1 13.4 7-day (3.28‑4.60) (3.72‑5.22) (4.48‑6.32) (5.14‑7.31) (6.00‑9.06) (6.65‑10.4) (7.24‑11.9) (7.80‑13.6) (8.64‑16.1) (9.28‑17.9) 4.37 4.96 5.98 6.87 8.15 9.20 10.3 11.4 13.0 14.3 10-day (3.72‑5.15) (4.22‑5.86) (5.07‑7.07) (5.79‑8.14) (6.68‑9.98) (7.36‑11.4) (7.96‑13.0) (8.49‑14.7) (9.31‑17.1) (9.93‑19.0) 5.95 6.66 7.83 8.83 10.2 11.3 12.4 13.6 15.2 16.4 20-day (5.12‑6.92) (5.73‑7.76) (6.72‑9.15) (7.53‑10.3) (8.45‑12.3) (9.14‑13.8) (9.71‑15.5) (10.2‑17.3) (10.9‑19.7) (11.5‑21.6) 7.34 8.17 9.53 10.6 12.2 13.3 14.5 15.7 17.2 18.3 30-day (6.37‑8.49) (7.08‑9.46) (8.23‑11.0) (9.14‑12.4) (10.1‑14.5) (10.8‑16.1) (11.3‑17.8) (11.8‑19.7) (12.4‑22.2) (12.9‑24.0) 9.16 10.2 11.9 13.2 15.0 16.3 17.5 18.7 20.2 21.3 45-day (8.00‑10.5) (8.91‑11.7) (10.3‑13.7) (11.4‑15.3) (12.5‑17.6) (13.3‑19.4) (13.8‑21.4) (14.1‑23.4) (14.7‑25.9) (15.1‑27.8) 10.7 12.0 14.1 15.6 17.7 19.1 20.5 21.7 23.3 24.3 60-day (9.42‑12.3) (10.6‑13.8) (12.3‑16.1) (13.6‑18.0) (14.7‑20.7) (15.6‑22.7) (16.1‑24.8) (16.4‑27.0) (16.9‑29.6) (17.2‑31.6) 1 Precipitation frequency (PF) estimates in this table are based on frequency analysis of partial duration series (PDS). Numbers in parenthesis are PF estimates at lower and upper bounds of the 90% confidence interval. The probability that precipitation frequency estimates (for a given duration and average recurrence interval) will be greater than the upper bound (or less than the lower bound) is 5%. Estimates at upper bounds are not checked against probable maximum precipitation (PMP) estimates and may be higher than currently valid PMP values. Please refer to NOAA Atlas 14 document for more information. Back to Top PF graphical Page 86 of 131 Figure 4: Rational Method Storm Sewer Calculations Elm Creek Center - Rogers, Minnesota Storm Frequency: 10-Year Atlas 14 MNDOT IDF Region: Hennepin Type of Pipe: RCP Manning's Roughness Coefficient (n), RCP: 0.0120 Structure Pipe Time of Concentration (min) Area of Minimum Design Pipe Velocity of Runoff Runoff, Q Capacity Subcatchment, C x A Σ C x A Tdownstream node Intensity (in/hr) Required Pipe Diameter Design Full Subcatchment Coefficient, C Tcontrolling for Sewer Inlet To Node Length, L (ft) Slope (ft/ft) A (acre) Tinlet Tpipe [Tcontrolling (cfs) Full (cfs) Diameter (in) Pipe, V (fps) for Tinlet Intensity (in) +Tpipe] Proposed Storm Sewer to Existing Storm CB 105 CB 104 1S 61 0.0040 0.17 0.90 0.15 0.15 7.00 0.33 7.00 7.33 7.23 1.10 2.45 8.90 12 3.12 CB 104 CB 103 1S 128 0.0040 0.16 0.90 0.14 0.29 7.00 0.68 7.33 8.01 7.10 2.08 2.45 11.30 12 3.12 CB 103 CB 102 1S 61 0.0050 0.10 0.90 0.09 0.39 7.00 0.29 8.01 8.30 6.85 2.64 2.74 11.85 12 3.48 CB 102 CB 101 1S 101 0.0040 0.09 0.90 0.08 0.47 7.00 0.47 8.30 8.77 6.74 3.16 4.44 13.22 15 3.62 CB101 CB100 1S 147 0.0040 0.19 0.90 0.17 0.63 7.00 0.68 8.77 9.45 6.58 4.18 4.44 14.68 15 3.62 CB 106 CB 100 1S 143 0.0040 0.27 0.90 0.24 0.24 7.00 0.76 7.00 7.76 7.23 1.76 2.45 10.61 12 3.12 CB 100 CB EXISTING 1S 18 0.0040 0.48 0.90 0.43 1.31 7.00 0.06 9.45 9.51 6.35 8.33 15.54 19.01 24 4.95 4/24/2026 Page 87 of 131 Appendix B Existing Conditions 2-Year Summary Page 88 of 131 1S 2S 3S 4S Subcat 1S Subcat 2S Subcat 3S Subcat 4S 1L 2L 3L 4L West Offsite 136th Avenue Rogers Drive Main Street Frontage Road 5L Total Offsite Subcat Reach Pond Link Routing Diagram for Existing Conditions Prepared by Gregory Group DBA Demarc, Printed 3/27/2026 HydroCAD® 10.20-5c s/n 09313 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 89 of 131Existing Conditions Prepared by Gregory Group DBA Demarc Printed 3/27/2026 HydroCAD® 10.20-5c s/n 09313 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 2 Area Listing (all nodes) Area CN Description (sq-ft) (subcatchment-numbers) 63,380 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C (1S, 2S, 3S, 4S) 63,380 74 TOTAL AREA Page 90 of 131Existing Conditions MSE 24-hr 3 2-Year Rainfall=2.86" Prepared by Gregory Group DBA Demarc Printed 3/27/2026 HydroCAD® 10.20-5c s/n 09313 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 3 Time span=0.00-72.00 hrs, dt=0.01 hrs, 7201 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv. Reach routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method Subcatchment 1S: Subcat 1S Runoff Area=46,534 sf 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=0.82" Tc=7.0 min CN=74/0 Runoff=1.51 cfs 3,182 cf Subcatchment 2S: Subcat 2S Runoff Area=8,615 sf 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=0.82" Tc=7.0 min CN=74/0 Runoff=0.28 cfs 589 cf Subcatchment 3S: Subcat 3S Runoff Area=6,031 sf 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=0.82" Tc=7.0 min CN=74/0 Runoff=0.20 cfs 412 cf Subcatchment 4S: Subcat 4S Runoff Area=2,199 sf 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=0.82" Tc=7.0 min CN=74/0 Runoff=0.07 cfs 150 cf Link 1L: West Offsite Inflow=1.51 cfs 3,182 cf Primary=1.51 cfs 3,182 cf Link 2L: 136th Avenue Inflow=0.28 cfs 589 cf Primary=0.28 cfs 589 cf Link 3L: Rogers Drive Inflow=0.20 cfs 412 cf Primary=0.20 cfs 412 cf Link 4L: Main Street Frontage Road Inflow=0.07 cfs 150 cf Primary=0.07 cfs 150 cf Link 5L: Total Offsite Inflow=2.06 cfs 4,335 cf Primary=2.06 cfs 4,335 cf Total Runoff Area = 63,380 sf Runoff Volume = 4,335 cf Average Runoff Depth = 0.82" 100.00% Pervious = 63,380 sf 0.00% Impervious = 0 sf Page 91 of 131Existing Conditions MSE 24-hr 3 2-Year Rainfall=2.86" Prepared by Gregory Group DBA Demarc Printed 3/27/2026 HydroCAD® 10.20-5c s/n 09313 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 4 Summary for Subcatchment 1S: Subcat 1S Runoff = 1.51 cfs @ 12.15 hrs, Volume= 3,182 cf, Depth= 0.82" Routed to Link 1L : West Offsite Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv., Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 2-Year Rainfall=2.86" Area (sf) CN Description 46,534 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C 46,534 74 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 7.0 Direct Entry, Summary for Subcatchment 2S: Subcat 2S Runoff = 0.28 cfs @ 12.15 hrs, Volume= 589 cf, Depth= 0.82" Routed to Link 2L : 136th Avenue Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv., Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 2-Year Rainfall=2.86" Area (sf) CN Description 8,615 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C 8,615 74 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 7.0 Direct Entry, Summary for Subcatchment 3S: Subcat 3S Runoff = 0.20 cfs @ 12.15 hrs, Volume= 412 cf, Depth= 0.82" Routed to Link 3L : Rogers Drive Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv., Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 2-Year Rainfall=2.86" Area (sf) CN Description 6,031 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C 6,031 74 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 7.0 Direct Entry, Page 92 of 131Existing Conditions MSE 24-hr 3 2-Year Rainfall=2.86" Prepared by Gregory Group DBA Demarc Printed 3/27/2026 HydroCAD® 10.20-5c s/n 09313 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 5 Summary for Subcatchment 4S: Subcat 4S Runoff = 0.07 cfs @ 12.15 hrs, Volume= 150 cf, Depth= 0.82" Routed to Link 4L : Main Street Frontage Road Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv., Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 2-Year Rainfall=2.86" Area (sf) CN Description 2,199 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C 2,199 74 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 7.0 Direct Entry, Summary for Link 1L: West Offsite Inflow Area = 46,534 sf, 0.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 0.82" for 2-Year event Inflow = 1.51 cfs @ 12.15 hrs, Volume= 3,182 cf Primary = 1.51 cfs @ 12.15 hrs, Volume= 3,182 cf, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routed to Link 5L : Total Offsite Primary outflow = Inflow, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Summary for Link 2L: 136th Avenue Inflow Area = 8,615 sf, 0.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 0.82" for 2-Year event Inflow = 0.28 cfs @ 12.15 hrs, Volume= 589 cf Primary = 0.28 cfs @ 12.15 hrs, Volume= 589 cf, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routed to Link 5L : Total Offsite Primary outflow = Inflow, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Summary for Link 3L: Rogers Drive Inflow Area = 6,031 sf, 0.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 0.82" for 2-Year event Inflow = 0.20 cfs @ 12.15 hrs, Volume= 412 cf Primary = 0.20 cfs @ 12.15 hrs, Volume= 412 cf, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routed to Link 5L : Total Offsite Primary outflow = Inflow, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Summary for Link 4L: Main Street Frontage Road Inflow Area = 2,199 sf, 0.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 0.82" for 2-Year event Inflow = 0.07 cfs @ 12.15 hrs, Volume= 150 cf Primary = 0.07 cfs @ 12.15 hrs, Volume= 150 cf, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routed to Link 5L : Total Offsite Page 93 of 131Existing Conditions MSE 24-hr 3 2-Year Rainfall=2.86" Prepared by Gregory Group DBA Demarc Printed 3/27/2026 HydroCAD® 10.20-5c s/n 09313 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 6 Primary outflow = Inflow, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Summary for Link 5L: Total Offsite Inflow Area = 63,380 sf, 0.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 0.82" for 2-Year event Inflow = 2.06 cfs @ 12.15 hrs, Volume= 4,335 cf Primary = 2.06 cfs @ 12.15 hrs, Volume= 4,335 cf, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Primary outflow = Inflow, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Page 94 of 131 Appendix C Existing Conditions 10-Year Summary Page 95 of 131Existing Conditions MSE 24-hr 3 10-Year Rainfall=4.26" Prepared by Gregory Group DBA Demarc Printed 3/27/2026 HydroCAD® 10.20-5c s/n 09313 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 7 Summary for Subcatchment 1S: Subcat 1S Runoff = 3.41 cfs @ 12.15 hrs, Volume= 6,940 cf, Depth= 1.79" Routed to Link 1L : West Offsite Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv., Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 10-Year Rainfall=4.26" Area (sf) CN Description 46,534 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C 46,534 74 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 7.0 Direct Entry, Summary for Subcatchment 2S: Subcat 2S Runoff = 0.63 cfs @ 12.15 hrs, Volume= 1,285 cf, Depth= 1.79" Routed to Link 2L : 136th Avenue Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv., Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 10-Year Rainfall=4.26" Area (sf) CN Description 8,615 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C 8,615 74 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 7.0 Direct Entry, Summary for Subcatchment 3S: Subcat 3S Runoff = 0.44 cfs @ 12.15 hrs, Volume= 900 cf, Depth= 1.79" Routed to Link 3L : Rogers Drive Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv., Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 10-Year Rainfall=4.26" Area (sf) CN Description 6,031 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C 6,031 74 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 7.0 Direct Entry, Page 96 of 131Existing Conditions MSE 24-hr 3 10-Year Rainfall=4.26" Prepared by Gregory Group DBA Demarc Printed 3/27/2026 HydroCAD® 10.20-5c s/n 09313 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 8 Summary for Subcatchment 4S: Subcat 4S Runoff = 0.16 cfs @ 12.15 hrs, Volume= 328 cf, Depth= 1.79" Routed to Link 4L : Main Street Frontage Road Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv., Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 10-Year Rainfall=4.26" Area (sf) CN Description 2,199 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C 2,199 74 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 7.0 Direct Entry, Summary for Link 1L: West Offsite Inflow Area = 46,534 sf, 0.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 1.79" for 10-Year event Inflow = 3.41 cfs @ 12.15 hrs, Volume= 6,940 cf Primary = 3.41 cfs @ 12.15 hrs, Volume= 6,940 cf, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routed to Link 5L : Total Offsite Primary outflow = Inflow, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Summary for Link 2L: 136th Avenue Inflow Area = 8,615 sf, 0.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 1.79" for 10-Year event Inflow = 0.63 cfs @ 12.15 hrs, Volume= 1,285 cf Primary = 0.63 cfs @ 12.15 hrs, Volume= 1,285 cf, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routed to Link 5L : Total Offsite Primary outflow = Inflow, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Summary for Link 3L: Rogers Drive Inflow Area = 6,031 sf, 0.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 1.79" for 10-Year event Inflow = 0.44 cfs @ 12.15 hrs, Volume= 900 cf Primary = 0.44 cfs @ 12.15 hrs, Volume= 900 cf, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routed to Link 5L : Total Offsite Primary outflow = Inflow, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Summary for Link 4L: Main Street Frontage Road Inflow Area = 2,199 sf, 0.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 1.79" for 10-Year event Inflow = 0.16 cfs @ 12.15 hrs, Volume= 328 cf Primary = 0.16 cfs @ 12.15 hrs, Volume= 328 cf, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routed to Link 5L : Total Offsite Page 97 of 131Existing Conditions MSE 24-hr 3 10-Year Rainfall=4.26" Prepared by Gregory Group DBA Demarc Printed 3/27/2026 HydroCAD® 10.20-5c s/n 09313 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 9 Primary outflow = Inflow, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Summary for Link 5L: Total Offsite Inflow Area = 63,380 sf, 0.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 1.79" for 10-Year event Inflow = 4.64 cfs @ 12.15 hrs, Volume= 9,452 cf Primary = 4.64 cfs @ 12.15 hrs, Volume= 9,452 cf, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Primary outflow = Inflow, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Page 98 of 131 Appendix D Existing Conditions 100-Year Summary Page 99 of 131Existing Conditions MSE 24-hr 3 100-Year Rainfall=7.13" Prepared by Gregory Group DBA Demarc Printed 3/27/2026 HydroCAD® 10.20-5c s/n 09313 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 10 Summary for Subcatchment 1S: Subcat 1S Runoff = 7.84 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 16,115 cf, Depth= 4.16" Routed to Link 1L : West Offsite Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv., Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 100-Year Rainfall=7.13" Area (sf) CN Description 46,534 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C 46,534 74 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 7.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment 1S: Subcat 1S Hydrograph Runoff 7.84 cfs 8 MSE 24-hr 3 7 100-Year Rainfall=7.13" 6 Runoff Area=46,534 sf Runoff Volume=16,115 cf 5 Runoff Depth=4.16" Flow4 (cfs) Tc=7.0 min CN=74/0 3 2 1 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 72 Time (hours) Page 100 of 131Existing Conditions MSE 24-hr 3 100-Year Rainfall=7.13" Prepared by Gregory Group DBA Demarc Printed 3/27/2026 HydroCAD® 10.20-5c s/n 09313 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 11 Summary for Subcatchment 2S: Subcat 2S Runoff = 1.45 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 2,983 cf, Depth= 4.16" Routed to Link 2L : 136th Avenue Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv., Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 100-Year Rainfall=7.13" Area (sf) CN Description 8,615 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C 8,615 74 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 7.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment 2S: Subcat 2S Hydrograph Runoff 1.45 cfs MSE 24-hr 3 100-Year Rainfall=7.13" Runoff Area=8,615 sf 1 Runoff Volume=2,983 cf Runoff Depth=4.16" Flow (cfs) Tc=7.0 min CN=74/0 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 72 Time (hours) Page 101 of 131Existing Conditions MSE 24-hr 3 100-Year Rainfall=7.13" Prepared by Gregory Group DBA Demarc Printed 3/27/2026 HydroCAD® 10.20-5c s/n 09313 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 12 Summary for Subcatchment 3S: Subcat 3S Runoff = 1.02 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 2,089 cf, Depth= 4.16" Routed to Link 3L : Rogers Drive Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv., Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 100-Year Rainfall=7.13" Area (sf) CN Description 6,031 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C 6,031 74 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 7.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment 3S: Subcat 3S Hydrograph Runoff 1.02 cfs 1 MSE 24-hr 3 100-Year Rainfall=7.13" Runoff Area=6,031 sf Runoff Volume=2,089 cf Runoff Depth=4.16" Flow (cfs) Tc=7.0 min CN=74/0 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 72 Time (hours) Page 102 of 131Existing Conditions MSE 24-hr 3 100-Year Rainfall=7.13" Prepared by Gregory Group DBA Demarc Printed 3/27/2026 HydroCAD® 10.20-5c s/n 09313 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 13 Summary for Subcatchment 4S: Subcat 4S Runoff = 0.37 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 762 cf, Depth= 4.16" Routed to Link 4L : Main Street Frontage Road Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv., Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 100-Year Rainfall=7.13" Area (sf) CN Description 2,199 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C 2,199 74 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 7.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment 4S: Subcat 4S Hydrograph Runoff 0.4 0.37 cfs 0.38 0.36 MSE 24-hr 3 0.34 0.32 100-Year Rainfall=7.13" 0.3 0.28 Runoff Area=2,199 sf 0.26 0.24 Runoff Volume=762 cf 0.22 0.2 Runoff Depth=4.16" Flow0.18 (cfs) 0.16 Tc=7.0 min 0.14 CN=74/0 0.12 0.1 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.02 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 72 Time (hours) Page 103 of 131Existing Conditions MSE 24-hr 3 100-Year Rainfall=7.13" Prepared by Gregory Group DBA Demarc Printed 3/27/2026 HydroCAD® 10.20-5c s/n 09313 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 14 Summary for Link 1L: West Offsite Inflow Area = 46,534 sf, 0.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 4.16" for 100-Year event Inflow = 7.84 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 16,115 cf Primary = 7.84 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 16,115 cf, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routed to Link 5L : Total Offsite Primary outflow = Inflow, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Link 1L: West Offsite Hydrograph Inflow 7.84 cfs Primary 7.84 cfs 8 Inflow Area=46,534 sf 7 6 5 4 Flow (cfs) 3 2 1 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 72 Time (hours) Page 104 of 131Existing Conditions MSE 24-hr 3 100-Year Rainfall=7.13" Prepared by Gregory Group DBA Demarc Printed 3/27/2026 HydroCAD® 10.20-5c s/n 09313 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 15 Summary for Link 2L: 136th Avenue Inflow Area = 8,615 sf, 0.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 4.16" for 100-Year event Inflow = 1.45 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 2,983 cf Primary = 1.45 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 2,983 cf, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routed to Link 5L : Total Offsite Primary outflow = Inflow, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Link 2L: 136th Avenue Hydrograph Inflow 1.45 cfs Primary 1.45 cfs Inflow Area=8,615 sf 1 Flow (cfs) 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 72 Time (hours) Page 105 of 131Existing Conditions MSE 24-hr 3 100-Year Rainfall=7.13" Prepared by Gregory Group DBA Demarc Printed 3/27/2026 HydroCAD® 10.20-5c s/n 09313 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 16 Summary for Link 3L: Rogers Drive Inflow Area = 6,031 sf, 0.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 4.16" for 100-Year event Inflow = 1.02 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 2,089 cf Primary = 1.02 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 2,089 cf, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routed to Link 5L : Total Offsite Primary outflow = Inflow, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Link 3L: Rogers Drive Hydrograph Inflow 1.02 cfs Primary 1.02 cfs 1 Inflow Area=6,031 sf Flow (cfs) 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 72 Time (hours) Page 106 of 131Existing Conditions MSE 24-hr 3 100-Year Rainfall=7.13" Prepared by Gregory Group DBA Demarc Printed 3/27/2026 HydroCAD® 10.20-5c s/n 09313 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 17 Summary for Link 4L: Main Street Frontage Road Inflow Area = 2,199 sf, 0.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 4.16" for 100-Year event Inflow = 0.37 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 762 cf Primary = 0.37 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 762 cf, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routed to Link 5L : Total Offsite Primary outflow = Inflow, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Link 4L: Main Street Frontage Road Hydrograph Inflow 0.37 cfs Primary 0.4 0.37 cfs 0.38 Inflow Area=2,199 sf 0.36 0.34 0.32 0.3 0.28 0.26 0.24 0.22 0.2 Flow0.18 (cfs) 0.16 0.14 0.12 0.1 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.02 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 72 Time (hours) Page 107 of 131Existing Conditions MSE 24-hr 3 100-Year Rainfall=7.13" Prepared by Gregory Group DBA Demarc Printed 3/27/2026 HydroCAD® 10.20-5c s/n 09313 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 18 Summary for Link 5L: Total Offsite Inflow Area = 63,380 sf, 0.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 4.16" for 100-Year event Inflow = 10.67 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 21,948 cf Primary = 10.67 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 21,948 cf, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Primary outflow = Inflow, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Link 5L: Total Offsite Hydrograph Inflow 10.67 cfs Primary 10.67 cfs 11 Inflow Area=63,380 sf 10 9 8 7 6 Flow (cfs) 5 4 3 2 1 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 72 Time (hours) Page 108 of 131 Appendix E Proposed Conditions 2-Year Summary Page 109 of 131 1S 2S 3S Subcat 1S Subcat 2S Subcat 3S 1L 2L 3L West Offsite 136th Avenue Rogers Drive 4L Total Offsite Subcat Reach Pond Link Routing Diagram for Proposed Conditions Prepared by Gregory Group DBA Demarc, Printed 4/24/2026 HydroCAD® 10.20-5c s/n 09313 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 110 of 131Proposed Conditions Prepared by Gregory Group DBA Demarc Printed 4/24/2026 HydroCAD® 10.20-5c s/n 09313 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 2 Area Listing (all nodes) Area CN Description (sq-ft) (subcatchment-numbers) 10,794 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C (1S, 2S, 3S) 42,719 98 Paved parking, HSG C (1S, 2S, 3S) 9,867 98 Roofs, HSG C (3S) 63,380 94 TOTAL AREA Page 111 of 131Proposed Conditions MSE 24-hr 3 2-Year Rainfall=2.86" Prepared by Gregory Group DBA Demarc Printed 4/24/2026 HydroCAD® 10.20-5c s/n 09313 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 3 Time span=0.00-72.00 hrs, dt=0.01 hrs, 7201 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv. Reach routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method Subcatchment 1S: Subcat 1S Runoff Area=1,610 sf 14.91% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.09" Tc=7.0 min CN=74/98 Runoff=0.07 cfs 146 cf Subcatchment 2S: Subcat 2S Runoff Area=2,950 sf 61.21% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.93" Tc=7.0 min CN=74/98 Runoff=0.21 cfs 474 cf Subcatchment 3S: Subcat 3S Runoff Area=58,819 sf 85.92% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.37" Tc=7.0 min CN=74/98 Runoff=4.98 cfs 11,638 cf Link 1L: West Offsite Inflow=0.07 cfs 146 cf Primary=0.07 cfs 146 cf Link 2L: 136th Avenue Inflow=0.21 cfs 474 cf Primary=0.21 cfs 474 cf Link 3L: Rogers Drive Inflow=4.98 cfs 11,638 cf Primary=4.98 cfs 11,638 cf Link 4L: Total Offsite Inflow=5.25 cfs 12,258 cf Primary=5.25 cfs 12,258 cf Total Runoff Area = 63,380 sf Runoff Volume = 12,258 cf Average Runoff Depth = 2.32" 17.03% Pervious = 10,794 sf 82.97% Impervious = 52,585 sf Page 112 of 131Proposed Conditions MSE 24-hr 3 2-Year Rainfall=2.86" Prepared by Gregory Group DBA Demarc Printed 4/24/2026 HydroCAD® 10.20-5c s/n 09313 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 4 Summary for Subcatchment 1S: Subcat 1S Runoff = 0.07 cfs @ 12.15 hrs, Volume= 146 cf, Depth= 1.09" Routed to Link 1L : West Offsite Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv., Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 2-Year Rainfall=2.86" Area (sf) CN Description 1,370 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C 240 98 Paved parking, HSG C 1,610 78 Weighted Average 1,370 74 85.09% Pervious Area 240 98 14.91% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 7.0 Direct Entry, Summary for Subcatchment 2S: Subcat 2S Runoff = 0.21 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 474 cf, Depth= 1.93" Routed to Link 2L : 136th Avenue Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv., Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 2-Year Rainfall=2.86" Area (sf) CN Description 1,144 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C 1,806 98 Paved parking, HSG C 2,950 89 Weighted Average 1,144 74 38.79% Pervious Area 1,806 98 61.21% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 7.0 Direct Entry, Summary for Subcatchment 3S: Subcat 3S Runoff = 4.98 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 11,638 cf, Depth= 2.37" Routed to Link 3L : Rogers Drive Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv., Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 2-Year Rainfall=2.86" Page 113 of 131Proposed Conditions MSE 24-hr 3 2-Year Rainfall=2.86" Prepared by Gregory Group DBA Demarc Printed 4/24/2026 HydroCAD® 10.20-5c s/n 09313 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 5 Area (sf) CN Description 8,280 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C 40,673 98 Paved parking, HSG C 9,867 98 Roofs, HSG C 58,819 95 Weighted Average 8,280 74 14.08% Pervious Area 50,539 98 85.92% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 7.0 Direct Entry, Summary for Link 1L: West Offsite Inflow Area = 1,610 sf, 14.91% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 1.09" for 2-Year event Inflow = 0.07 cfs @ 12.15 hrs, Volume= 146 cf Primary = 0.07 cfs @ 12.15 hrs, Volume= 146 cf, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routed to Link 4L : Total Offsite Primary outflow = Inflow, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Summary for Link 2L: 136th Avenue Inflow Area = 2,950 sf, 61.21% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 1.93" for 2-Year event Inflow = 0.21 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 474 cf Primary = 0.21 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 474 cf, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routed to Link 4L : Total Offsite Primary outflow = Inflow, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Summary for Link 3L: Rogers Drive Inflow Area = 58,819 sf, 85.92% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 2.37" for 2-Year event Inflow = 4.98 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 11,638 cf Primary = 4.98 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 11,638 cf, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routed to Link 4L : Total Offsite Primary outflow = Inflow, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Summary for Link 4L: Total Offsite Inflow Area = 63,380 sf, 82.97% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 2.32" for 2-Year event Inflow = 5.25 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 12,258 cf Primary = 5.25 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 12,258 cf, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Primary outflow = Inflow, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Page 114 of 131 Appendix F Proposed Conditions 10-Year Summary Page 115 of 131Proposed Conditions MSE 24-hr 3 10-Year Rainfall=4.26" Prepared by Gregory Group DBA Demarc Printed 4/24/2026 HydroCAD® 10.20-5c s/n 09313 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 6 Summary for Subcatchment 1S: Subcat 1S Runoff = 0.13 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 285 cf, Depth= 2.12" Routed to Link 1L : West Offsite Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv., Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 10-Year Rainfall=4.26" Area (sf) CN Description 1,370 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C 240 98 Paved parking, HSG C 1,610 78 Weighted Average 1,370 74 85.09% Pervious Area 240 98 14.91% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 7.0 Direct Entry, Summary for Subcatchment 2S: Subcat 2S Runoff = 0.34 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 776 cf, Depth= 3.16" Routed to Link 2L : 136th Avenue Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv., Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 10-Year Rainfall=4.26" Area (sf) CN Description 1,144 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C 1,806 98 Paved parking, HSG C 2,950 89 Weighted Average 1,144 74 38.79% Pervious Area 1,806 98 61.21% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 7.0 Direct Entry, Summary for Subcatchment 3S: Subcat 3S Runoff = 7.68 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 18,185 cf, Depth= 3.71" Routed to Link 3L : Rogers Drive Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv., Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 10-Year Rainfall=4.26" Page 116 of 131Proposed Conditions MSE 24-hr 3 10-Year Rainfall=4.26" Prepared by Gregory Group DBA Demarc Printed 4/24/2026 HydroCAD® 10.20-5c s/n 09313 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 7 Area (sf) CN Description 8,280 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C 40,673 98 Paved parking, HSG C 9,867 98 Roofs, HSG C 58,819 95 Weighted Average 8,280 74 14.08% Pervious Area 50,539 98 85.92% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 7.0 Direct Entry, Summary for Link 1L: West Offsite Inflow Area = 1,610 sf, 14.91% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 2.12" for 10-Year event Inflow = 0.13 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 285 cf Primary = 0.13 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 285 cf, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routed to Link 4L : Total Offsite Primary outflow = Inflow, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Summary for Link 2L: 136th Avenue Inflow Area = 2,950 sf, 61.21% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 3.16" for 10-Year event Inflow = 0.34 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 776 cf Primary = 0.34 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 776 cf, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routed to Link 4L : Total Offsite Primary outflow = Inflow, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Summary for Link 3L: Rogers Drive Inflow Area = 58,819 sf, 85.92% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 3.71" for 10-Year event Inflow = 7.68 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 18,185 cf Primary = 7.68 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 18,185 cf, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routed to Link 4L : Total Offsite Primary outflow = Inflow, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Summary for Link 4L: Total Offsite Inflow Area = 63,380 sf, 82.97% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 3.64" for 10-Year event Inflow = 8.15 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 19,246 cf Primary = 8.15 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 19,246 cf, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Primary outflow = Inflow, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Page 117 of 131 Appendix G Proposed Conditions 100-Year Summary Page 118 of 131Proposed Conditions MSE 24-hr 3 100-Year Rainfall=7.13" Prepared by Gregory Group DBA Demarc Printed 4/24/2026 HydroCAD® 10.20-5c s/n 09313 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 8 Summary for Subcatchment 1S: Subcat 1S Runoff = 0.29 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 612 cf, Depth= 4.56" Routed to Link 1L : West Offsite Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv., Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 100-Year Rainfall=7.13" Area (sf) CN Description 1,370 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C 240 98 Paved parking, HSG C 1,610 78 Weighted Average 1,370 74 85.09% Pervious Area 240 98 14.91% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 7.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment 1S: Subcat 1S Hydrograph 0.32 Runoff 0.3 0.29 cfs 0.28 MSE 24-hr 3 0.26 100-Year Rainfall=7.13" 0.24 0.22 Runoff Area=1,610 sf 0.2 Runoff Volume=612 cf 0.18 0.16 Runoff Depth=4.56" Flow0.14 (cfs) Tc=7.0 min 0.12 0.1 CN=74/98 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.02 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 72 Time (hours) Page 119 of 131Proposed Conditions MSE 24-hr 3 100-Year Rainfall=7.13" Prepared by Gregory Group DBA Demarc Printed 4/24/2026 HydroCAD® 10.20-5c s/n 09313 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 9 Summary for Subcatchment 2S: Subcat 2S Runoff = 0.62 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 1,433 cf, Depth= 5.83" Routed to Link 2L : 136th Avenue Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv., Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 100-Year Rainfall=7.13" Area (sf) CN Description 1,144 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C 1,806 98 Paved parking, HSG C 2,950 89 Weighted Average 1,144 74 38.79% Pervious Area 1,806 98 61.21% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 7.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment 2S: Subcat 2S Hydrograph Runoff 0.65 0.62 cfs 0.6 MSE 24-hr 3 0.55 100-Year Rainfall=7.13" 0.5 Runoff Area=2,950 sf 0.45 Runoff Volume=1,433 cf 0.4 0.35 Runoff Depth=5.83" Flow0.3 (cfs) Tc=7.0 min 0.25 CN=74/98 0.2 0.15 0.1 0.05 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 72 Time (hours) Page 120 of 131Proposed Conditions MSE 24-hr 3 100-Year Rainfall=7.13" Prepared by Gregory Group DBA Demarc Printed 4/24/2026 HydroCAD® 10.20-5c s/n 09313 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 10 Summary for Subcatchment 3S: Subcat 3S Runoff = 13.28 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 31,889 cf, Depth= 6.51" Routed to Link 3L : Rogers Drive Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Split Pervious/Imperv., Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 100-Year Rainfall=7.13" Area (sf) CN Description 8,280 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C 40,673 98 Paved parking, HSG C 9,867 98 Roofs, HSG C 58,819 95 Weighted Average 8,280 74 14.08% Pervious Area 50,539 98 85.92% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 7.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment 3S: Subcat 3S Hydrograph Runoff 14 13.28 cfs 13 MSE 24-hr 3 12 100-Year Rainfall=7.13" 11 Runoff Area=58,819 sf 10 9 Runoff Volume=31,889 cf 8 Runoff Depth=6.51" 7 Flow (cfs) Tc=7.0 min 6 CN=74/98 5 4 3 2 1 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 72 Time (hours) Page 121 of 131Proposed Conditions MSE 24-hr 3 100-Year Rainfall=7.13" Prepared by Gregory Group DBA Demarc Printed 4/24/2026 HydroCAD® 10.20-5c s/n 09313 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 11 Summary for Link 1L: West Offsite Inflow Area = 1,610 sf, 14.91% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 4.56" for 100-Year event Inflow = 0.29 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 612 cf Primary = 0.29 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 612 cf, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routed to Link 4L : Total Offsite Primary outflow = Inflow, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Link 1L: West Offsite Hydrograph Inflow 0.32 0.29 cfs Primary 0.3 0.29 cfs Inflow Area=1,610 sf 0.28 0.26 0.24 0.22 0.2 0.18 0.16 Flow0.14 (cfs) 0.12 0.1 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.02 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 72 Time (hours) Page 122 of 131Proposed Conditions MSE 24-hr 3 100-Year Rainfall=7.13" Prepared by Gregory Group DBA Demarc Printed 4/24/2026 HydroCAD® 10.20-5c s/n 09313 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 12 Summary for Link 2L: 136th Avenue Inflow Area = 2,950 sf, 61.21% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 5.83" for 100-Year event Inflow = 0.62 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 1,433 cf Primary = 0.62 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 1,433 cf, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routed to Link 4L : Total Offsite Primary outflow = Inflow, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Link 2L: 136th Avenue Hydrograph Inflow 0.62 cfs Primary 0.65 0.62 cfs Inflow Area=2,950 sf 0.6 0.55 0.5 0.45 0.4 0.35 Flow0.3 (cfs) 0.25 0.2 0.15 0.1 0.05 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 72 Time (hours) Page 123 of 131Proposed Conditions MSE 24-hr 3 100-Year Rainfall=7.13" Prepared by Gregory Group DBA Demarc Printed 4/24/2026 HydroCAD® 10.20-5c s/n 09313 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 13 Summary for Link 3L: Rogers Drive Inflow Area = 58,819 sf, 85.92% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 6.51" for 100-Year event Inflow = 13.28 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 31,889 cf Primary = 13.28 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 31,889 cf, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routed to Link 4L : Total Offsite Primary outflow = Inflow, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Link 3L: Rogers Drive Hydrograph Inflow 13.28 cfs Primary 14 13.28 cfs Inflow Area=58,819 sf 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 Flow (cfs) 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 72 Time (hours) Page 124 of 131Proposed Conditions MSE 24-hr 3 100-Year Rainfall=7.13" Prepared by Gregory Group DBA Demarc Printed 4/24/2026 HydroCAD® 10.20-5c s/n 09313 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 14 Summary for Link 4L: Total Offsite Inflow Area = 63,380 sf, 82.97% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 6.42" for 100-Year event Inflow = 14.19 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 33,934 cf Primary = 14.19 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 33,934 cf, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Primary outflow = Inflow, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Link 4L: Total Offsite Hydrograph Inflow 14.19 cfs Primary 15 14.19 cfs 14 Inflow Area=63,380 sf 13 12 11 10 9 8 Flow7 (cfs) 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 72 Time (hours) Page 125 of 131 Appendix H Soil Summary Page 126 of 131 Soil Map—Hennepin County, Minnesota 93° 33' 5'' W 93° 33' 0'' W 456690 456700 456710 456720 456730 456740 456750 456760 456770 456780 456790 45° 12' 8'' N 45° 12' 8'' N 5005570 5005570 5005560 5005560 5005550 5005550 5005540 5005540 5005530 5005530 5005520 5005520 5005510 5005510 5005500 5005500 5005490 5005490 5005480 5005480 5005470 5005470 5005460 5005460 5005450 5005450 5005440 5005440 5005430 5005430 Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. 5005420 45° 12' 3'' N 5005420 45° 12' 3'' N 456690 456700 456710 456720 456730 456740 456750 456760 456770 456780 456790 Map Scale: 1:748 if printed on A portrait (8.5" x 11") sheet. 93° 33' 5'' W Meters 93° 33' 0'' W N 0 10 20 40 60 Feet 0 35 70 140 210 Map projection: Web Mercator Corner coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 15N WGS84 Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 3/26/2026 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 3 Page 127 of 131Soil Map—Hennepin County, Minnesota Map Unit Legend Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI L37B Angus loam, 2 to 6 percent 2.5 100.0% slopes Totals for Area of Interest 2.5 100.0% Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 3/26/2026 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3 Page 128 of 131Map Unit Description: Angus loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes---Hennepin County, Minnesota Hennepin County, Minnesota L37B—Angus loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: 2syrq Landscape: Till plains Elevation: 690 to 1,840 feet Mean annual precipitation: 24 to 37 inches Mean annual air temperature: 43 to 52 degrees F Frost-free period: 140 to 180 days Farmland classification: All areas are prime farmland Map Unit Composition Angus and similar soils: 80 percent Minor components: 20 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Angus Setting Landscape: Till plains Landform: On leeward side of drainages hillslopes, Ground moraines Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve, rise Down-slope shape: Convex Across-slope shape: Convex, linear Parent material: Fine-loamy till Typical profile Ap - 0 to 7 inches: loam Bt - 7 to 37 inches: clay loam BC - 37 to 50 inches: clay loam C - 50 to 79 inches: loam Properties and qualities Slope: 2 to 6 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Drainage class: Well drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high (0.20 to 2.00 in/hr) Depth to water table: About 39 to 51 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Calcium carbonate, maximum content: 20 percent Maximum salinity: Nonsaline to very slightly saline (0.0 to 2.0 mmhos/cm) Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: High (about 10.3 inches) Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 3/26/2026 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 3 Page 129 of 131Map Unit Description: Angus loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes---Hennepin County, Minnesota Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2e Hydrologic Soil Group: C Ecological site: R103XY020MN - Loamy Upland Savannas Forage suitability group: Sloping Upland, Neutral (G103XS002MN) Other vegetative classification: Sloping Upland, Neutral (G103XS002MN) Hydric soil rating: No Minor Components Angus, moderately eroded Percent of map unit: 10 percent Landscape: Till plains Landform: On leeward side of drainages hillslopes, Ground moraines Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit, shoulder Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve, rise Down-slope shape: Convex Across-slope shape: Convex, linear Ecological site: R103XY020MN - Loamy Upland Savannas Other vegetative classification: Sloping Upland, Neutral (G103XS002MN) Hydric soil rating: No Cordova Percent of map unit: 5 percent Landscape: Till plains Landform: Ground moraines Landform position (three-dimensional): Dip Down-slope shape: Concave Across-slope shape: Linear Ecological site: F103XY027MN - Loamy Wet Forests Other vegetative classification: Level Swale, Neutral (G103XS001MN) Hydric soil rating: Yes Le sueur Percent of map unit: 5 percent Landscape: Till plains Landform: On leeward side of drainages hillslopes, Ground moraines Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve, talf Down-slope shape: Convex, linear Across-slope shape: Linear Ecological site: R103XY020MN - Loamy Upland Savannas Other vegetative classification: Level Swale, Neutral (G103XS001MN) Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 3/26/2026 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 3 Page 130 of 131Map Unit Description: Angus loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes---Hennepin County, Minnesota Hydric soil rating: No Data Source Information Soil Survey Area: Hennepin County, Minnesota Survey Area Data: Version 21, Sep 10, 2025 Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 3/26/2026 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3 Page 131 of 131